Deep learning rainfall-runoff predictions of extreme events

Jonathan Frame,Frederik Kratzert,Daniel Klotz,Martin Gauch,Guy Shelev,Oren Gilon,Logan M. Qualls,Hoshin V. Gupta,Grey S. Nearing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-423
2021-08-18
Abstract:Abstract. The most accurate rainfall-runoff predictions are currently based on deep learning. There is a concern among hydrologists that data-driven models based on deep learning may not be reliable in extrapolation or for predicting extreme events. This study tests that hypothesis using Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs) and an LSTM variant that is architecturally constrained to conserve mass. The LSTM (and the mass-conserving LSTM variant) remained relatively accurate in predicting extreme (high return-period) events compared to both a conceptual model (the Sacramento Model) and a process-based model (US National Water Model), even when extreme events were not included in the training period. Adding mass balance constraints to the data-driven model (LSTM) reduced model skill during extreme events.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?