Abstract:Sarcasm is commonly used in everyday language; however, little is currently known about cultural and individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use, particularly across Western and Eastern cultures. To address these gaps in the literature, the present study investigated individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use in the UK and China. Participants first rated literal and sarcastic comments regarding degree of perceived sarcasm, aggression, amusement, and politeness. They then completed tasks which assessed their theory of mind (ToM) ability, perspective taking ability, and sarcasm use tendency. The results showed that UK participants were more sarcastic than Chinese participants. In terms of interpretation, UK participants rated sarcasm as being more amusing and polite than literal criticism, whereas the Chinese data showed that sarcasm was rated as being more amusing but also more aggressive than literal criticism. ToM ability and perspective taking ability positively predicted sarcasm perception in both cultural groups, while the effects of ToM on other rating dimensions varied across cultures. Sarcasm use tendency negatively predicted perception of sarcasm and aggression in UK participants, whereas the opposite was found for Chinese participants. The decomposition of individual difference effects showed that different facets of interpretation and socio-emotional impact of sarcasm are differentially associated with different cultural and individual differences factors. From this, we propose that both cultural and individual differences factors modulate sarcasm interpretation and use: Participants from different cultures and with different traits may view sarcasm differently, which, in turn, affects their interpretation and use of sarcastic language. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Humor at work: exploring supervisors’ sarcasm, self-disparaging and vulgar language based humor, and verbal aggression

Employee Humor Can Shield Them from Abusive Supervision

Humor and Morality in Organizations

Subordinate humor and leader-member exchange relationships: Laugh and the boss laughs with you?

The Impact of Leader Humor on Subordinate Job Satisfaction

Laughters Nurturing Tears for Leaders and Organizations: the Implications of Leader Humor for Leader Workplace Deviance

It is all in good humor? Examining the impact of salesperson evaluations of leader humor on salesperson job satisfaction and job stress

Gender, formal organizational status and humor use: perceptions of social acceptance

Coworker-targeted leader aggressive humor and observers' OCB: The mediating roles of observers' cognitive and affective trust and the moderating role of LMX

Teachers' social competencies, occupational health, and personal well-being are associated with their use of snark in the classroom

Conversational humor and job satisfaction at work: exploring the role of humor production, appreciation, and positive affect

The relationships among sleep quality, humor styles, and use of curse words

Self-deprecating humor and task persistence: the moderating role of self-defeating humor style

Why does leader aggressive humor lead to bystander workplace withdrawal behavior?—Based on the dual path perspective of cognition- affection

Verbal humor in intercultural workplaces and second language learning: an overview of main research directions in the last 20 years

Signaling trustworthiness: The effect of leader humor on feedback-seeking behavior

Humor in Dark Personalities: An Empirical Study on the Link Between Four Humor Styles and the Distinct Subfactors of Psychopathy and Narcissism

Individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use: Evidence from the UK and China.

Leader Failed Humor and Follower Advice Seeking

Leader affiliative humour and work outcomes in multicultural teams

Bad bosses and self‐verification: The moderating role of core self‐evaluations with trust in workplace management