Clinical efficacy and safety of MP-AzeFlu for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis

Zhenhua Zhong,Youfang Xun,Xinyi Shi,Bing Guan,Maohua Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-07048-1
2021-08-20
Abstract:ObjectiveMP-AzeFlu is a novel option for therapy of allergic rhinitis (AR). The purpose of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy of MP-AzeFlu for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, compared to placebo and azelastine monotherapy.MethodsThe PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were comprehensively searched for all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of using MP-AzeFlu nasal spray on July 26, 2019. In these studies, we selected patients with clinical symptom scores. The heterogeneity of the included studies was assessed by I2.ResultsAmong the 336 citations retrieved, 6 articles with over 6000 patients were finally included in the meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis revealed that MP-AzeFlu was superior to placebo ( − 2.43 [95%CI,  − 2.73 to  − 2.14], P < 0.00001) and azelastine ( − 1.27 [95% CI,  − 1.57 to  − 0.97], P < 0.00001) in reflective total nasal symptom score. In the MP-AzeFlu group, the instantaneous total nasal symptom score ( − 2.56 [95% CI,  − 3.02 to  − 2.10], P < 0.00001) and the reflective total ocular symptom score ( − 1.22 [95% CI,  − 1.57 to  − 0.87], P < 0.00001) were significantly reduced compared to the placebo group.ConclusionMP-AzeFlu is as safe and mild as placebo and azelastine, which also is associated with symptom relief and the improvement of quality of life in AR patients. MP-AzeFlu can provide better clinical benefits than two currently available first-line intranasal therapies. It is an ideal therapy for AR patients.
otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?