Abstract:Debt Policy, Corporate Taxes, and Discount Rates This paper studies the valuation of assets with debt tax shields when debt policy is a general time-dependent function of the asset’s unlevered cash flows, value, and history. In a continuous-time setting, it shows that the value of a project’s debt tax shield satisfies a partial differential equation, which simplifies to an easily solved ordinary differential equation for most plausible debt policies. A large class of cases exhibits closed-form solutions for the value of a levered asset, the value of its tax shield, and the appropriate cost of capital for discounting unlevered cash flows so as to account for the value of the tax shield. Perhaps the most popular application of financial theory is capital budgeting. Virtually every student of finance starts his education in the field by learning how to discount future cash flows. By the end of a first course, the student has developed the basic tools to implement a discounted cash flow analysis in a real world setting. Because the real world setting must account for the relative advantage of debt financing, arising from the debt interest tax subsidy, students of finance generally learn that such subsidies can be accounted for by discounting unlevered cash flows (also referred to as “free cash flows”) at a tax-adjusted weighted average cost of capital (or WACC). Such tax adjustments to the discount rate generate a value for levered assets that exceed the value they would have if they were not levered with debt financing. Despite the central importance of this topic, research on how to do a proper valuation for capital budgeting purposes is sparse and largely ancient, particularly when it comes to debt tax shields. An intrinsic difficulty associated with the valuation of debt tax shields is identifying the risk of the tax deductions arising from the stream of future debt interest expenses. The rate at which one discounts the future stream of interest-related tax shields, and hence the value of those tax shields, has eluded prior research, except for the simplest of cases. These cases impose stringent restrictions on the cash flow process and debt policy to circumvent the complex issue of risk and valuation. Among these are the models of Modigliani and Miller (1958) and Miles and Ezzell (1985). The Modigliani and Miller debt policy is one where the debt level is constant and debt is both perpetual and default-free. This debt policy implies that one can discount the stream of future interest-based tax shields at the risk-free rate. If the tax rate is constant, as they assume, the debt tax shield’s present value is necessarily proportional to the present value of the debt because the cash flow stream from debt and the tax shield are proportional to one another. Here, since the constant of proportionality is the corporate tax rate, the present value of the debt tax shield is the product of the corporate tax rate and the present value of the debt. Modigliani and Miller (1958) also use this model to develop formulas for discount rates that account for the value of the tax shield when cash flows have no tendency to grow. The interesting case studied by Miles and Ezzell focuses on the dynamic issuance of perpetual risk-free debt. This case assumes: 1) the unlevered cash flow realization at each date follows a random walk with no drift, which is paid out upon its realization (hence there is no expected growth), 2) the unlevered cash flow stream is valued by applying a constant discount rate, and 3) the debt-to-asset ratio is constant. Under these assumptions, the cash flow from each date’s tax shield is of the same risk as the one period lagged unlevered cash flow. As Grinblatt and Titman (1997, 2002) and Brealey and Meyers (2000) point out, Despite attempts to introduce the Adjusted Present Value method into the classroom, the Weighted Average Cost of Capital approach still vastly dominates the practitioner landscape. For example, Graham and Harvey (2001) observe that of twelve capital budgeting techniques, many of which are long out of favor with finance academics, the Adjusted Present Value method is the least-used method.

Asset depreciation method comparison: An excel-based classroom exercise

Analysis of Risk and Prevention Related to Asset

Excel best practices

Comparison analysis of the fixed asset depreciation method

Depreciation and the Time Value of Money

An Electronic Teaching Assistant for Basic Operations Management Methods

Accounting and Tax Accounting of Fixed Assets, Intangible Assets and Depreciation for Development and Improvement of Approaches to Assessment of the Company's Assets

Getting on board with certified public accountant evolution: re-evaluating a financial statement analysis project in light of a changing profession

Process Approach and Construction of the Database for Non-Core Asset Management in Credit Organizations

Factors influencing the choice of depreciation method for valuation purposes

The mathematics-based learning method and its impact on student performance in the Introductory Accounting course: cognitive load theory

Impact of Depreciation Deduction Calculation Method on Financial Soundness Improvement of Economic Agents

Computer Laboratory Asset Management System with Analytics

Fair Value and Cost Accounting, Depreciation Methods, Recognition and Measurement for Fixed Assets

Big Data Asset Pricing: Exercises

Application of MS Excel and FastTest PlugIn to automatically evaluate the students' performance in structural engineering courses

Welcome Debt Policy , Corporate Taxes , and Discount Rates ∗ †

Comparative characteristics of accounting of fixed assets according to national and international standards

Excel Modelling - Transparency, Auditing and Business Use

An Integrated Approach to Teaching the Statement of Cash Flows

Analysis Use of Fixed Assets Depreciation Method on Company Profits,