Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of preferences when small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are confronted with the practical problems associated with implementing frequent and large-scale changes to their working policies and practices. This paper aims to alleviate some of the concerns as claimed in positioning and change agency theory by introducing “preferential role positioning” to organizational change. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a qualitative case study approach and change agency and positioning theories to find out the extent to which staff and management experienced the practical difficulties and challenges and what resolution actions they took. Eighty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2004/2005 and 2011 with the staff and management of four SMEs in the UK. An interpretative analysis was conducted on the case data in the tradition of Husserl and Schutz. In the first set, participants were asked to elucidate the difficulties faced in their roles and how these were experienced whilst the second focused on impacts and strategies. Three independent researchers reviewed and interpreted the qualitative data and helped with the coding and thematization. Findings This paper's main results are based on the data's three stages showing how SME members chose to deal with the practical difficulties namely “new structures and procedures” (stage 1); “new ways of communicating” (stage 2) and “new collaborations” (stage 3). The combination of the stages' aspects led to the emergence of “preferential role positioning” as the study's theoretical contribution to the gap on preferences in organizational change research. Research limitations/implications The eighty-five interviews from UK-based SMEs constrained the sample size thereby limiting the number of questionnaire categories asked. The findings and their analysis cannot be generalized to non-SMEs that seek to address similar difficulties. Practical implications Managers need to be aware of the adverse impacts of using draconian, top-down disciplinary and punishment measures/structures as a way to implement change. Other practical lessons include the fact that managers should contextualize people's anxieties, dissatisfaction, resistance and disengagement as a platform from which social knowledge can be generated with all change agents in order to resolve implementation challenges in the longer term. Staff developed the ability to deal with some practical issues such as navigating through the new departmental structures, new working procedures and new ways of talking with management and with each other to implement change more successfully. Social implications The social value of the findings demonstrates that preferences can be imported from other social science disciplines into Organizational Studies to show the value of what people can contribute and how they choose to do so (i.e. via what discourse, using what types of interactions and capabilities to do so). In addition, the results show that management need to consider employees in their plans as they try to implement change firstly to facilitate greater interaction and success, secondly to minimize implementation difficulties and thirdly as a recognition that there are multiple change agents and multiple role-enacting positions in developing sociological knowledge that can be of value. Originality/value This study's three-stage approach has shown that a successful implementation and management of change in SMEs should also include a bottom-up recognition of the difficulties, adversities, conflicts and tensions and a resolution to deal with the structural and communicative constraints via dialogue and “preferential role positioning”.

Help wanted? Employers' use of temporary agencies in the UK construction industry

'I'm a bit of an invisible worker' – Health care and social sector students' experiences of casual and temporary agency work

Staff preferences in four SMEs experiencing organizational change

Enhancing the employability of temporary agency workers: the interplay between agency support and client company investments

Dual Labour Markets at Work: The Impact of Employers' Use of Temporary Agency Work on Regular Workers' Job Stability

The changing nature of the workplace and the future of office space

Stuck in the door? A study of temporary agency work as an entry point to the labor market

Corporate Social Responsibility in Temporary Agency Work: A Study of Restaurant Work in Finland

Transitioning young people into employment in the Australian construction industry: the trust-building role of project-based intermediaries

Dynamism and realignment in the HR architecture: Online labor platform ecosystems and the key role of contractors

"Comparisons are Odious"? - Exploring the Dual Effect of Upward Social Comparison on Workplace Coping Behaviors of Temporary Agency Workers

Key factors affecting commercial actors in collaborative working within the UK construction industry

The linkage between human resource practices and organizational ambidexterity: An analysis of internal labor market dynamics in a port-of-entry context

Recruitment in the gig economy: attraction and selection on digital platforms

Impact of technology use on workforce performance and information access in the construction industry

Occupational safety and health and temporary agency work in multiemployer restaurants

Has Agency Theory Run its Course?: Making the Theory more Flexible to Inform the Management of Reward Systems

Study and Revelation on Temporary Work Abroad: Based on the Enterprise HRM Perspective

The business of care: Private placement agencies and female migrant workers in London

Public administration research since 1980: slipping away from the real world?

New perspectives on construction supply chain integration