Abstract:A tolerance framework is developed to address a group multiple criteria ranking problem with indirect preference information, which is referred to as the interaction, importance and tolerance of criteria as well as pairwise comparisons among alternatives and criteria. Choquet integral preference model is employed to capture the interaction, importance and tolerance of criteria, all of which are specific to decision makers (DMs). Some mandatory/sufficient requirements concerning criteria which are global or local, also called the tolerance attitudes of DMs, are quantified as tolerability constraints. Preference disaggregation analysis is extended to solve this type of tolerability constraints for preference elicitation. Confronted with the inconsistency issue (the feasibility of the whole preference constraints translated from indirect preference information), cause oriented strategy and consequence oriented strategy are established by regression-based mixed 0–1 integer linear programs with the objectives of the most credible minimal inconsistent preference constraints and the most credible maximal preference constraints in the context of group decision making. Considering a wide range of the minimal unsatisfied subsets of preference constraints responsible for the inconsistency and the maximum satisfied subsets of preference constraints as a consistent result, to reach a robust decision, stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA)-like simulation analysis is generated to examine the whole instances of compatible preference models in the modified feasible preference polyhedron and compute the result in a probabilistic form. Simulation experiment is conducted to investigate the influence of global tolerance attitudes of DMs on preference elicitation in conservative and radical scenarios. Finally, the application of the proposed approach to a credit ranking of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the comparison analysis with objective methods are presented and discussed for the effectiveness of the proposed tolerance framework.

Further Developments and Tests of a Progressive Algorithm for Multiple Criteria Decision Making

A Progressive Algorithm for Modeling and Solving Multiple-Criteria Decision Problems

An Automatic Method to Reach Consensus in a Local Context for AHP Group Decision Making

Progressive methods in multiple criteria decision analysis

Decision-aid and decision-making

A Study of Decision Process in MCDM Problems with Large Number of Criteria

Algorithms for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Efficiency Analysis Problems

Analytic Hierarchy Process in Multiple–Criteria Decision–Making: A Model Example

Research on the Satisfaction Degree and Criteria Weight Obtaining for Multiple Criteria Decision Making Problem

Deep preference learning for multiple criteria decision analysis

Large-scale multiple criteria decision-making with missing values: project selection through TOPSIS-OPA

Tolerance framework for robust group multiple criteria decision making

Predictive and simultaneous weighting of criteria and alternatives (PSWCA) in multi-criteria decision making based on past data

Non-Euler–Lagrangian Pareto-optimality Conditions for Dynamic Multiple Criterion Decision Problems

An Interactive Neural Network-Based Approach for Solving Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Problems

A generalized TOPSIS method for group decision making with heterogeneous information in a dynamic environment

Multi-Criteria Comparison as a Method of Advancing Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning

Multi-stage consistency optimization algorithm for decision making with incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relation

Projection Method for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making with Incomplete Weight Information in Linguistic Setting

A linear programming method for multiple criteria decision making with probabilistic linguistic information

A New Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Using the Dice Similarity Measure under Fermatean Fuzzy Environments