Abstract:INTRODUCTION: The increase in the number of natural disasters has made different societies constantly discover and invent solutions to control the adverse effects of disasters with more emphasis on prevention or minimize them by improving the quality of the rescue process (in the response phase). In the last few decades, the need for social participation in order to manage risks has been developing in the form of community-based activities. This study was conducted to present a community-based crisis management model focusing on the process of relief and rescue in natural disasters in Iran, 2020. METHODS: This qualitative study was performed based on the grounded theory method defined by Strauss and Corbin. The statistical population of the study included all crisis management and non-governmental organizations experts in universities, the Crisis Management Organization, general managers of provincial crisis management, and senior managers of the Red Crescent Society. The samples were selected using the purposive and theoretical method of snowball sampling while taking into account the geographical, climatic, cultural, social, and religious diversity of different regions of the country. As a result, the sample size was obtained at 22 people. The required data were collected through a semi-structured interview. In the analysis of qualitative information, open coding, axial coding, and selective coding were used manually). FINDINGS: The results of the study showed that the causal conditions of community-based crisis management included "legal obligation", "strategic planning", "attracting public participation", "forming and developing expert teams", and "acting (prevention, preparedness, needs analysis, planning, and response)"; and contextual conditions consisted of "geographical conditions", "social capacity building", and "creating cohesion and empathy". Moreover, intervening conditions involved "general sensitization", "preparation", and "logistics and equipment"; strategies included "risk management", "human resource management", "training (general and professional)" and "barrier removal"; and the consequences of community-based crisis management consisted of "increasing public awareness in the face of emergencies", "reducing the risk of areas "increasing community resilience", "improving the quality of post-disaster assessment", "accelerating the response process", "determining priorities appropriately", "saving the golden time of rescue", "increasing the number of survivors", "accelerating relief operations" "distributing relief items fairly", "improving the quality of rescue operations", "decreasing the amount of damage", "managing resources and facilities properly", "reducing response costs", "decreasing the adverse psychological effects of the disaster", "organized presence of grassroots groups", "eliminating the shortcomings and completing the performance of the responsible agencies", and "increasing the level of public satisfaction". CONCLUSION: Community-based crisis management is a new and effective approach that its implementation has a positive impact on increasing resilience and thus reducing the vulnerability of communities. The proper and successful implementation of the community-based approach requires structural changes, amendment of laws, and development of relevant bylaws. It also needs measures that should be implemented at the national level, in the country's crisis management system, and at the local level.

Disaster risk assessment of primary healthcare facilities in South East of Iran: a study with approach of disaster risk reduction

Comparative Analysis of Two Disaster Risk Assessment Tools for Primary Health Care Centers: The Case of Iran

A Longitudinal Study of Hospital Safety From Disasters in Kermanshah Province, Iran: Insights for Disaster Risk Reduction

Evaluating the disaster preparedness of emergency medical services (EMS) facilities: a cross-sectional investigation in Iran

Assessing hospital disaster preparedness in Tehran: Lessons learned on disaster and mass casualty management system

Post-disaster damage and loss assessment in the Iranian healthcare sector: a qualitative interview study

73: HOSPITAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE AGAINST DISASTERS: EVIDENCE FROM HOSPITALS IN IRAN

Disaster Preparedness: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Hospital Staff

Resilience assessment of health-care facilities within urban context: learning from a non-profit hospital in Tehran, Iran

A qualitative evaluation of the challenges in management for patients with chronic diseases during disasters in Iran

Exploring hospitals' functional preparedness effective factors in response to disasters: a qualitative study in a lower middle-income country

2012-2025 Roadmap of I.R.Iran’s Disaster Health Management

Determining the Factors Affecting the Retrofitting of Health-Care Facilities: A Qualitative Study

Disaster risk governance in Iran: Document analysis

Evaluating the efficiency of relief centers in disaster and epidemic conditions using multi-criteria decision-making methods and GIS: A case study

Improving the non-structural preparedness of the selected hospital based on the FOCUS-PDCA1 model: action research

Experiences of operating room nurses in disaster preparedness of a great disaster in Iran: a qualitative study

Developing a conceptual model of post-disaster damage and loss assessment program in the Iranian health sector: a qualitative study protocol

Disaster preparedness knowledge and its relationship with triage decision-making among hospital and pre-hospital emergency nurses - Ardabil, Iran

A comprehensive environmental scanning and strategic analysis of Iranian Public Hospitals: a prospective approach

Community-based Crisis Management Model Focusing on the Process of Relief and Rescue in Natural Disasters in Iran