Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine the link between boards and audit committees and firm performance in Kuwaiti listed firms in the context of recent and extensive corporate governance regulatory reform. Design/methodology/approach Panel data regression analysis with fixed effects and clustered standard errors of firm performance for 61–97 listed industrial and services firms in Kuwait over a seven-year period. The dependent variables are the returns on assets and equity, the debt-to-equity ratio and leverage and Tobin's Q and the independent variables comprise board of directors and audit committee characteristics, including size, the number of meetings and the numbers of independent and outside board and expert committee members. Firm size, subsidiary status and cash flow serve as control variables. Findings Mixed results with respect to the characteristics of the board of directors. Board size and independent and outsider board members positively relate only to Tobin's Q and insiders only to debt to equity. For audit committee characteristics, committee size, independence and expertise positively relate to the return on equity and committee size and expertise only to Tobin's Q. Of the five performance measures considered, board and audit committee characteristics together best determine Tobin's Q. Research limitations/implications Data from a single country limits generalisability and control variables necessarily limited in a developing market context. Need for qualitative insights into corporate governance reform as a complement to conventional quantitative analysis. In combining accounting and market information, Tobin's Q appears best able to recognise the performance benefits of good corporate governance in terms of internal organisational change. Practical implications The recent corporate governance code and guidelines reforms exert a mixed impact on firm performance, with audit committees, not boards, of most influence. But recent reforms implied most change to boards of directors. One suggestion is that non-market reform may have been unneeded given existing market pressure on listed firms and firms anticipating regulatory change. Social implications Kuwait's corporate governance reforms codified corporate governance practices already in place among many of its firms in pursuit of organisational legitimacy, and while invoking substantial change to audit committees, involved minor change to firm performance, at least in the short term. Some firms may also have delisted in expectation of stronger corporate governance requirements. Regardless, these direct and indirect processes both improved the overall quality of listed firm corporate governance and performance in Kuwait. Originality/value Seminal analysis of corporate governance reforms in Kuwait, which have rapidly progressed from no corporate governance code and guidelines to an initially voluntary and then compulsory regime. Only known analysis to incorporate both board of directors and audit committee characteristics. Reveals studies of the corporate governance–firm performance relationship may face difficulty in model specification, and empirical significance, given the complexity of corporate governance codes and guidelines, leads in changing firm behaviour and self-selection of firms into and out of regulated markets.

Non‐executive directors and the UK's new combined code on corporate governance

The Combined Code in the UK: A General Review

Comply or explain in corporate governance codes: in need of greater regulatory oversight?

Do independent directors enhance better corporate governance in companies in India?

The influence of corporate governance and shareholding structure on corporate social responsibility: The key role of executive compensation

The impact of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility at the board-level: A critical assessment

The Role of Board of Directors: Delegation vs Involvement in the Strategic Decision-making

A Long-Term Vision for UK Firms? Revisiting the Target Director's Advisory Role Since the Takeover of Cadbury'S PLC

Independent Directors: One Head, Two Hats - A Mismatch between Delaware Corporate Law and Federal Securities Law

Executive Board Chairs: Examining the Performance Consequences of a Corporate Governance Hybrid

Board Network,Governance Role of Independent Directors and Executive Incentives

Attributes of corporate boards and assurance of corporate social responsibility reporting: evidence from the UK

The governance of the voluntary and community sector - the starting point

Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom

Does the Secretary of the Board of Directors Duality Matter? Evidence from the New Requirement of Updating Listing Rules to Improve the Quality of Information Disclosure

Corporate governance in Kuwait: joining the dots between regulatory reform, organisational change in boards and audit committees and firm market and accounting performance

Unintended Consequences of the Independent Board Requirement on CEO Power

Compliant in principle! and in practice? Internal audit at listed companies in the Netherlands: beyond compliance with the Dutch Corporate Governance Code

Corporate Governance Configurations and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Audit Committee and Board characteristics

A Comparative Analysis of Directors` Duty of Care, Skill and Diligence in Sri Lanka, Australia and UK

A Study on the Non-executive Director System