Abstract:Consumer feedback and complaints provide utilities with useful data about consumer perceptions of aesthetic water quality in the distribution system. This research provides a systematic approach to interpret consumer complaint water quality data provided by four water utilities that recorded consumer complaints, but did not routinely process the data. The utilities tended to write down a myriad of descriptors that were too numerous or contained a variety of spellings so that electronic "harvesting" was not possible and much manual labor was required to categorize the complaints into majors areas, such as suggested by the Drinking Water Taste and Odor Wheel or existing check-sheets. When the consumer complaint data were categorized and visualized using spider (or radar) and run-time plots, major taste, odor, and appearance patterns emerged that clarified the issue and could provide guidance to the utility on the nature and extent of the problem. A caveat is that while humans readily identify visual issues with the water, such as color, cloudiness, or rust, describing specific tastes and odors in drinking water is acknowledged to be much more difficult for humans to achieve without training. This was demonstrated with two utility groups and a group of consumers identifying the odors of orange, 2-methylisoborneol, and dimethyl trisulfide. All three groups readily and succinctly identified the familiar orange odor. The two utility groups were much more able to identify the musty odor of 2-methylisoborneol, which was likely familiar to them from their work with raw and finished water. Dimethyl trisulfide, a garlic-onion odor associated with sulfur compounds in drinking water, was the least familiar to all three groups, although the laboratory staff did best. These results indicate that utility personnel should be tolerant of consumers who can assuredly say the water is different, but cannot describe the problem. Also, it indicates that a T&O program at a utility would benefit from identification of aesthetic issues in water.

A critical review of methods used for the sensory evaluation of water quality

Toward the Upgrading Quality of Drinking Water from Flavor Evaluation: Taste, Feeling, and Retronasal Odor Issues

Assessment of an Evaluation Approach for Malodorous Rivers

Humans as Sensors to Evaluate Drinking Water Taste and Odor: A Review

Check-if-apply approach for consumers and utilities to communicate about drinking water aesthetics quality

Applications of Online UV-Vis Spectrophotometer for Drinking Water Quality Monitoring and Process Control: A Review

Emerging Methods for the Evaluation of Sensory Quality of Food: Technology at Service

Systematic tracking, visualizing, and interpreting of consumer feedback for drinking water quality

A Surface Water Quality Assessment Method Based on Combination Weight

Research Progress in Evaluation of Tastes and Odors Compounds in Water and Their Detection Technology

Water quality analysis by UV-Vis spectroscopy: A review of methodology and application

Water Quality Monitoring and Evaluation Using Remote Sensing Techniques in China: a Systematic Review

Descriptive Analysis Testing for Sensory Evaluation Second

A Critical Review on Quantitative Evaluation of Aqueous Toxicity in Water Quality Assessment.

Training of panellists for the sensory control of bottled natural mineral water in connection with water chemical properties

Identifying the Factors Affecting Sensory Evaluation of Drinking Water and Assessing Its Social Impact Based on Drinking Water Consumption

A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Monitoring Devices: Materials Advances, Current Status, and Future Perspective

From Traditional to Intelligent, A Review of Application and Progress of Sensory Analysis in Alcoholic Beverage Industry

A Critical Review of Methods for Analyzing Freshwater Eutrophication

Application of solid phase extraction (SPE) coupled to dispersive liquid–liquid micro-extraction (DLLME) and sensory evaluation technique for the study of taste and odor active compounds in water

Application of Sensory Evaluation, HS‐SPME GC‐MS, E‐Nose, and E‐Tongue for Quality Detection in Citrus Fruits