Abstract:Uncertainty and fuzziness pervade natural language both explicitly and implicitly. The explicit presence of uncertainty and fuzziness is exemplified by statements like I believe that tomorrow will probably be a bit colder than today, while the presence of implicit uncertainty and/or fuzziness can be referred to background domain knowledge, e.g. in the statement Tomorrow will be rainy because the weather forecast says so, it is part of the background knowledge that weather forecasts are uncertain and that the notion of being rainy is not crisp. Argument mining, namely the task of automatically identifying and analyzing arguments in natural language texts, is receiving an increasing attention from the research communities of formal argumentation and computational linguistics, since the argumentation paradigm provides a very general and intuitive model of human communication, interaction and reasoning activities. Most current formal (or semi-formal) argumentation models however allow for very limited ways, if any, to express explicit uncertainty and fuzziness within argument structure. On the one hand, there are several proposals to encompass uncertainty (mainly adopting a probabilistic representation) and fuzziness within the formalism of Dung's argumentation frameworks, which however is not suitable for a direct representation of natural language arguments since it lies at a too abstract level. On the other hand, several models which are meant to capture more closely the way humans conceive and produce arguments, like Walton's argumentation schemes, up to now do not encompass explicit forms of uncertainty or fuzziness. Further, dealing with implicit uncertainty in formal argumentation is largely an open question. This evidences a big gap between current argumentation models and the capability of faithfully capturing the information conveyed by natural language texts: in particular, the use of current models implies a drastic simplification in (or, simply, the suppression of) the representation of uncertainty and fuzziness. The talk will discuss the modeling challenges posed by the presence of uncertainty and fuzziness in natural language texts (first of all the problem of defining a suitable ontology for these concepts, e.g. in order to distinguish different kinds of uncertainty) and analyze some research directions aiming at addressing these challenges in the context of argumentation models.

A new cognitive model: Cloud model

Qualitative Cognition for Uncertainty Knowledge Using Cloud Model.

Uncertainty reasoning based on cloud models in controllers

Information Cell Mixture Models: the Cognitive Representations of Vague Concepts.

Special Issue on Dealing with Uncertainty in Data Mining and Information Extraction

A Multi-Layer Cloud State Space Model and Its Application

Presentation of Uncertain Knowledge in Group Complex Decision Making Based on Cloud Theory

Measurement Uncertainty Using Cloud Model

A Novel Risk Matrix Approach Based on Cloud Model for Risk Assessment Under Uncertainty

Uncertainty and Fuzziness from Natural Language to Argumentation Models

Statistical Cognition Theory and Its Applications:An Overview

Dynamic uncertain causality graph based on cloud model theory for knowledge representation and reasoning

Multi-level cognitive concept learning method oriented to data sets with fuzziness: a perspective from features

Multi-stage skewed grey cloud clustering model and its application

A Quantum Cognitive Map Model

Cognitive Model Based on Granular Computing

A new cognitive approach based on dynamic evolution of the grey hazy set

Mathematical Modeling of Clutter: Descriptive Vs. Generative Models

A Novel Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Hybrid Cloud Model and Extended Best‐worst Method for Multicriteria Decision Making

Research of Rough Cognitive Map Model

Uncertainty Theory: A Branch of Mathematics for Modeling Human Uncertainty