The rapid and slow impacts of implicit reappraisal and distraction

Qinghua Wang,Qin Zhang,Chenyang Shang,Lixia Cui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06885-7
IF: 2.8
2024-11-02
Current Psychology
Abstract:Some studies have shown that implicit reappraisal and implicit distraction have significant immediate effects, but it is still unclear whether they have lasting effects. This study used subjective reports and event-related potential (ERP) measures to further examine the immediate and lasting effects of implicit reappraisal and distraction. This study had two stages: implicit emotion regulation stage and emotional stimuli re-presentation stage. In the first stage, Sentence Unscrambling Task was employed to implicitly activate individuals to use reappraisal or distraction strategy, followed by the presentation of negative pictures to the participants. After a 10-minute interval, participants entered the second stage. The same pictures were shown again, but without emotion regulation induction. ERP data were collected from participants as they viewed the pictures. Participants were also asked to assess their negative experiences and emotion arousal after each picture disappeared. Results showed larger frontal LPPs under implicit reappraisal (850–2000 ms after pictures onset) and distraction (850–1250 ms) than under control condition in implicit emotion regulation stage, reflecting immediate impacts of the two strategies on the electrophysiological indicator related to participants' cognitive effort. Further, compared to control condition, implicit reappraisal and distraction reduced subjective negative experiences and emotion arousal only in the stimuli re-presentation stage, confirming delayed effects of the two strategies. Also, our self-report results showed that implicit distraction had a larger delayed effect than implicit reappraisal. These results provide evidence for the rapid impact of implicit emotion regulation on individuals' electrophysiological responses and the slow impact on an individual's subjective experience.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?