Muscle Torque–Velocity Relationships and Fatigue With Reduced Knee Joint Range of Motion in Young and Older Adults
Zoe H. Smith,R. Anthony Martin,Erica Casto,Carol Bigelow,Michael A. Busa,Jane A. Kent
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2023-0130
2024-01-01
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Abstract:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of knee joint range of motion (RoM) on the torque–velocity relationship and fatigue in the knee extensor muscles of 7 young (median = 26 y) and 7 older (68 y) adults. Each leg was assigned a RoM (35° or 75°) over which to perform a torque–velocity protocol (maximal isokinetic contractions, 60–300°·s −1 ) and a fatigue protocol (120 maximal contractions at 120°·s −1 , 0.5 Hz). Six older participants were unable to reach 300°·s −1 over 35°. Therefore, the velocity eliciting 75% of peak torque at 60°·s −1 ( V 75 , °·s −1 ) was calculated for each RoM from a fit of individual torque–velocity curves (60–240°·s −1 ), and Δ V 75 (35°–75°) was determined. Fatigue (final torque/initial torque) was used to calculate Δfatigue (35°–75°). Δ V 75 was not different from 0 in young (−28.3°·s −1 [−158.6 to 55.7], median [range], P = .091) or older (−18.5°·s −1 [−95.0 to 23.9], P = .128), with no difference by age ( P = .710). In contrast, fatigue was greater for 75° in young (Δfatigue = 25.9% [17.5–30.3], P = .018) and older (17.2% [11.9–52.9], P = .018), with no effect of age ( P = .710). These data indicate that, regardless of age, RoM did not alter the torque–velocity relationship between 60 and 240°·s −1 , and fatigue was greater with a larger RoM.
engineering, biomedical,sport sciences