Abstract:Securing adequate capital is an ongoing challenge for small and medium-sized family businesses (SMFBS). However, most theoretical and empirical studies of capital structure focus on public corporations. Propositions relating to profits maximization and assumptions of perfect information and rational economic behavior have limited the validity of these theories, casting some doubt on their ability to explain capital structure decisions in SMFBS. An alternative approach propose that, in raising finance, managers follow a pecking order in which internal funds are preferred, followed by debt, hybrid securities, and then, as a last resort, a new issue of ordinary share. The new pecking order theory does not rely on the existence of a target debt-equity ratio and seems to explain the actual financing behavior of SMFBS because they are believed to be more adverse to risk and loss of control.According to the new pecking order theory, considerable studies have been conducted on the financing behavior of SMFBS. First, experimental studies show that SMFBS obtain most of their capital by internal finance. Moreover, plenty of household resources flow into businesses because of the intermingling of family and business finance in SMFBS. The household-to-business intermingling creates less constructive behaviors and leads to decisions that are good in short run but not for long-run sustainability. Although family sources may play a critical role during the very early stages of the business, external sources became increasingly important as the business grew and matured. Second, debt financing is the major sources of external funds for SMFBS. SMFB’s owner-managers are believed to act to reduce risk exposure by maintaining lower debt levels, but this opinion is not always supported by empirical evidence. Some studies provide evidence that, thanks to personal and well-informed relationships with banks and other parties, SMFBS enjoy greater availability and lower cost of credit than non-family business. On the contrary, some studies indicate that there are virtually no differences between them in the usage of various credit products. Therefore, researchers have to resort to other approaches such as the financial growth circle theory to explain this controversy. Third, compared with non-family businesses, the equity route of SMFBS is proved to follow the linear process of dilution as supposed by the classical financial theory because of risk factors and beliefs that advantages of stock exchange listing outweigh its advantages. When compared with their non-family counterparts, SMFBS are less likely to use venture capital for the fear of dilution of control and loss of management freedom. Also, some SMFBS in certain countries have gone public and competed successfully with non-family business on the new market. Ownership concentration is positively evaluated by investors on this market, thus family interest and business interest are balanced in a long-term strategy which is simultaneously in favor of family control and entry of external investment.Plenty of researches have identified that SMFB owner’s personal characteristic and preference are of significant influence in capital structure decisions. Therefore, future research should attempt to develop empirically-based models that show relationships between those factors and SMFB owner-manager’s financing decisions. In addition, it would be helpful to employ dynamic analysis to explain the dynamic change of SMFB’S financing behavior. Last but not least, future research might seek to find out what competitive advantages or disadvantages the ″special financial logic″ of SMFB financing lead to and thus provide support for decision-making of owner-managers and policy-makers.

Resource Mobilization and Performance in Family and Nonfamily Businesses in the United Kingdom

A Survey of Studies on Small and Medium-sized Family Business Financing

Family business culture: a strategic resource and driver of firm performance

Family Firms, Corporate Governance and Performance: Evidence from Zhejiang

Corporate Entrepreneurship in Family Firms: the Roles of Family Commitment and Long-Term Orientation

Family involvement and family firm internationalization: The moderating effects of board experience and geographical distance

When Does Family Ownership Promote Proactive Environmental Strategy? the Role of the Firm’s Long-Term Orientation

Does familial decision control affect the entrepreneurial orientation of family firms? The moderating role of family relationships

Family business and financial performance: Current state of knowledge and future research challenges

Dynamism in Adversity: a Comparative Study of Trends in the Performance of Listed Family- and Non-Family-Controlled Companies in Hong Kong, 1997–2014

The IMPACT of FAMILY SOCIAL CAPITAL on RESOURCE DEPLOYMENT in CHINESE ENTREPRENEURIAL FIRMS

Family firm competitiveness and owner involvement

Long-term Orientation, Investment Smoothing and Performance Mechanism of Family Business

Family Firm Configurations for High Performance: The Role of Entrepreneurship and Ambidexterity

External corporate venturing in family firms: a behavioural perspective

Reputational risk and firm performance: Family versus nonfamily firms in different regulatory environments

Mergers and acquisitions in family businesses: current literature and future insights

Does Family Meet Its Affective Need by Owning and Operating Business in Socioemotional Wealth Ways?

Family Firm Governance and Financial Policy Choices in Newly Public Firms

An empirical investigation of the influence of leadership styles and strategic decision-making on business performance: a generational ownership perspective

Rethinking family business resilience: an empirical examination of family firms' performance amid the COVID-19 pandemic in the US