Abstract:Ambidextrous leadership is key to solving organizational tension and complex problems. This type of leadership has gained attention in the field of organizational behavior in recent years. Ambidextrous leadership refers to a set of two complementary leadership behaviors and the flexibility switch between two different behaviors. Existing studies noted the extensive benefits of ambidextrous leadership to employees and organizations. These advantages include enhancement of the psychological empowerment of employees, exploratory and exploitative behaviors, innovation, and organizational change. Prior studies focused on ambidextrous leadership from the Western context. These studies include opening-closing leadership and transformational-transactional leadership. However, the consequences of indigenous ambidextrous leadership in the Chinese context remain poorly understood. A particular ambidextrous leadership embedded in Chinese culture was identified, namely, authoritarian-benevolent leadership. The present study focuses on the combination of authoritarian and benevolent leadership, which is regarded as a type of indigenous ambidextrous leadership. The researchers aimed to investigate the effect of different combination modes of benevolent and authoritarian leadership on the work outcome of subordinates and its underlying mechanism. The researchers identified four scenarios by combining the two kinds of leadership, namely, high authority-high benevolence, low authority-low benevolence, high authority-low benevolence, low authority-high benevolence. This approach was based on the level of authoritarian and benevolent leadership. The former two forms of leadership fall under the congruence category, whereas the latter two fall under the incongruence category. By drawing on followership theory, the researchers expected that the active implementation of subordinates was high when leaders were at a high level of authoritarian leadership and benevolent leadership than when at a low level of authoritarian leadership and benevolent leadership. The researchers also found that the active implementation of subordinates was high when the benevolent leadership of leaders exceeded authoritarian leadership rather than when authoritarian leadership exceeded benevolent leadership. Third, the active implementation of subordinates carried the joint effect of benevolent and authority leadership to the job performance of followers. A multiwave, multiresource survey was used to test the hypotheses. Surveys were given to 204 voluntary subordinates at Time 1. They were required to report their leaders' benevolent leadership and authoritarian leadership and demographic information. The researchers obtained 183 effective survey responses. After one month, the researchers conducted Time 2 survey, which required leaders to rate the job performance of their subordinates. The subordinates were then required to rate their active implementation. A total of 130 effective survey responses were obtained. The researchers used polynomial regression combined with response surface analysis based on the two-wave data. The results supported the hypotheses. The findings offered several contributions to literature. First, different combination modes of benevolent and authoritarian leadership have different effects on the work outcome of subordinates. Second, the researchers uncovered the dynamics between authoritarian-benevolent leadership and work outcome of subordinates. These findings can aid Chinese scholars to gain an improved understanding of indigenous ambidextrous leadership. These findings advance the understanding on how authoritarian leadership combined with benevolent leadership affects the performance of followers. The findings also provide further practical insights to practitioners.

The influence of ambidextrous leadership on the employee innovative behavior: an empirical study based on Chinese manufacturing enterprises

How does ambidextrous leadership influence technological innovation performance? An empirical study based on high-tech enterprises

Effect of Chinese Employees' Emotional Creativity on Their Innovative Performance

The Authentic Leadership,the Psychological Capital and Employees' Innovative Behavior:The Mediating of the Leading Members

Moderating Multiple Mediation Model of the Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Employee Innovative Behavior

Influence of Ethical Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Behavior: the Role of Organization-Based Self-Esteem and Flexible Human Resource Management

Leader’s Implicit Followership and Employees’ Innovative Behavior: Chain Mediation Effect of Leader–Member Exchange and Psychological Empowerment

The Benefits of Ambidextrous Leadership Behavior for the Workplace Well-Being of Leaders

How does empowering leadership motivate employee innovative behavior: A job characteristics perspective

Differential leadership and innovation performance of new generation employees: the moderating effect of self-efficacy

Effects of Ambidextrous Leadership on Employees' Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment

The Synergy of Ambidextrous Leadership, Agility, and Entrepreneurial Orientation to Achieve Sustainable AI Product Innovation

Analysis of the Influence of Entrepreneur’s Psychological Capital on Employee’s Innovation Behavior Under Leader-Member Exchange Relationship

Impact of e-leadership on organizational innovation performance: Role of employee followership

The chain mediation effect of spiritual leadership on employees' innovative behavior

Innovation Ambidexterity and Knowledge Redundancy: the Moderating Effects of Transactional Leadership.

Can employee's boundary-spanning behavior exactly promote innovation performance? The roles of creative ideas generation and team task interdependence

Authoritarian-benevolent Leadership, Active Implementation and Job Performance: an Investigation on the Effectiveness of Ambidextrous Leadership in the Chinese Context

Ambidextrous leadership, social capital, creative behaviour and well-being: a mediation-moderation model

The influence of bootleg innovation on individual innovation performance: The mediating effect of cognitive flexibility and the moderating effect of leadership’s emotional intelligence

The Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Employees' Innovative Behaviors in Chinese Internet Technology Companies: The Mediating Role of Error Management Climate and Self-Efficacy