Outside the Lines: A Case Report Highlighting the Difficulties Faced Treating a Female Geriatric Patient with Anorexia Nervosa
Jai McQuilla,Margaret Cinderella,Jane Steiner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.157
2024-04-01
Abstract:Introduction Anorexia nervosa (AN) is the most common eating disorder diagnosed amongst the geriatric population. Despite this, prior diagnostic criteria for AN excluded this demographic. In the DSM- III, a diagnosis of AN could only be made in individuals under 30 years. This led to a focus on the treatment of young females, despite evidence that individuals may suffer from re-emergence of symptoms or late onset eating disorders. The most recent guidelines from the American Psychiatric Association specifically address treatment “for adolescent and young adults” but do not include recommendations for geriatric patients. There are currently no guidelines for treatment of AN in geriatric populations. Methods The patient's clinical documents in the electronic medical records system were reviewed. Data collection for information regarding- patient demographics and insurance accepted at residential eating disorder facilities in NC, SC, TN, and VA was completed. A literature review was performed on the topic of AN in geriatric females. Results Patient X was a 63 yo, Caucasian female with Medicare. X presented to her community ED requesting a “feeding tube.” X had a PPH of Anxiety, Depression, PTSD, and AN. X's PMH included gastroparesis, T2DM, GERD, osteopenia, Raynaud's, and HTN. X had an outpatient team that consisted of a PCP, psychiatrist she had seen 20+ years, therapist, and nutritionist. X's home regimen included: Quetiapine 50mg QHS, Aripiprazole 15mg daily, Bupropion XL 450mg daily, Duloxetine 120mg daily, Trazodone 150mg daily, Benztropine 2mg BID. Patient tested positive for Covid-19 but was asymptomatic on arrival and throughout hospitalization. Admission labs were as follows: Hgb 11.8, WBC 4.3 Na+ 137, K+ 3.2, BUN 10, Cr 0.9, Phos 2.7 and Mg2+ 1.8. The ED provider concluded X did not meet criteria for an emergent feeding tube but the patient's PCP requested that X be admitted for severe nutritional deficiency. X's BMI one month prior to admission was 19.38 kg/m2 and had decreased to 16.99 kg/m2 by presentation. X scored a 16/30 on her MOCA and both X and her outpatient team endorsed acute decline in cognitive function coinciding with reactivation of her eating disorder. X's outpatient Psychiatrist endorsed concern that patient's environment was triggering decompensation and endorsed belief that inpatient or residential AN treatment would be ideal. Upon admission GI briefly considered NG tube, but X refused and was adamant about PEG tube placement. X endorsed a history of success with PEG and residential eating disorder treatment in her 20s. During hospitalization patient continued to have minimal intake and perseverated on PEG tube. GI, Internal Medicine, and Psychiatry agreed that X's age and malnutrition placed her at higher risk for complications with invasive treatment. Per the "APA Level of Care Guidelines for Patients with Eating Disorders" X did not meet criteria for hospitalization but did meet criteria for residential treatment. GI, Psychiatry, and IM agreed that a PEG was too invasive, and the risk outweighed the benefits. It was feared that this intervention would not lead to weight restoration without close supervision and X was not accepted to a residential program. X lived alone and would likely get 1-2 weeks maximum at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) as she could complete all of her ADLs. Medication adjustments were made to increase sensorium and decrease appetite suppression. X's home trazodone, benztropine and bupropion were decreased. Aripiprazole was titrated down and discontinued and Olanzapine was started and titrated up to 5mg. Quetiapine was discontinued. Home Duloxetine was continued. X's outpatient Psychiatrist was aware and supportive of changes. X was discharged home with instructions to follow up with outpatient team, and without an option for supplemental nutrition via external devices. Patient stay was 7 days. Conclusions This case exemplifies the difficulties when treating geriatric patients with AN. While adolescent patients with similar symptoms would be referred to residential programs, there are minimal resources and no guidelines for treating geriatric patients with AN. All 5 residential facilities in the state of North Carolina endorsed ability to take Geriatric age patients that can complete ADL's. However, 0 out of 5 accepted Medicare and 2 out of 5 accepted Medicaid; this essentially limits care to low-income Medicaid eligible geriatric patients without disabilities and those who can cash pay. Although eating disorders affect patients across the lifespan, the majority of research and resources for effective treatment are focused on adolescents and young adults. In the future, effort must be made to include geriatric patients when studying eating disorders and developing treatments.
psychiatry,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology