Uncovering the Competences of Commonly Used Nutrient Media, Multi-primer Approach and Reference Databases in the Identification of Microalgae Diversity from Environmental Samples

Amal A. Badr,Walid M. Fouad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-855064/v1
2021-09-01
Abstract:Abstract Microalgae are highly diverse microorganisms and have a variety of benefits and use across different fields. On the other hand, their overgrowth can be extremely dangerous to our environment, thus, making it particularly important to continuously manage and track their abundance and diversity to oversee any potential of extinction or overgrowth. The vast diversity of microalgae imposes the challenge of their identification through the most common and economical identification method, morphological identification, and the more recent molecular-level identification tools. To enhance the identification of microalgae, we targeted enrichment of total microalgae diversity present in an environmental sample using four different enrichment media (BG-11, BBM, Modified media (MM), and half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium (MS)). Morphological identification of the enriched microalgae diversity was conducted every 4-days to monitor the population dynamics. After 14-day the DNA was extracted from the enriched population for molecular-level identification using 16S rRNA gene regions V1-V3 and V4-V5 and 18 rRNA gene V4 region. To further enhance microalgae identification through molecular-level identification, we evaluated three reference databases (SILVA, Greengenes, and Protist Ribosomal Reference (PR 2 )) to reveal their competence in microalgae diversity identification. A total of 38 microalgae were identified morphologically to the genus level, and the highest number of microalgae were identified through MM media (36), followed by BG-11 and BBM, 31 and 26, respectively. While sequencing the three-primer sets using the three databases, 87 microalgae were identified to the genus level. The highest diversity was identified using the MM media (71 genera) followed by BG-11 (69 genera), BBM (67 genera). Our multiple-media, primer, and reference database approach enabled us to identify a high microalgae diversity that would have been missed if a single approach was used over the other.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?