Practice With Less AI Makes Perfect: Partially Automated AI During Training Leads to Better Worker Motivation, Engagement, and Skill Acquisition
Mario Passalacqua,Robert Pellerin,Esma Yahia,Florian Magnani,Frédéric Rosin,Laurent Joblot,Pierre-Majorique Léger,Mario PassalacquaRobert PellerinEsma YahiaFlorian MagnaniFrédéric Rosin Laurent JoblotPierre-Majorique Légera Polytechnique Montreal,Canadab LISPEN and DynEO,Arts et Métiers ParisTech,Aix-en-Provence,Francec Université Aix-Marseille,CERGAM,École Centrale Méditerranée,Marseille,Franced Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology,LISPEN/HESAM University/UBFC,Chalon-sur-Saône,Francee HEC Montreal,CanadaMario Passalacqua is a Ph.D. candidate in industrial engineering at Polytechnique Montréal. He holds a master's degree in user experience from HEC Montréal and a bachelor's degree in psychology from McGill. His research examines the psychosocial component of human-AI interaction in the workplace,focusing on worker motivation,engagement,and trust.Robert Pellerin is a Full Professor in the Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering at Polytechnique Montreal. He holds degrees in engineering management (B.Eng.) and industrial engineering (Ph.D.). He is the current chairman of the Jarislowsky/AkinRéalis Research Chair and he is a member of CIRRELT and Poly-Industry 4.0 research groups.Esma Yahia is an associate professor at the École Nationale Supérieure des Arts et Métiers,Aix-en-Provence campus. She conducts her research activities at the Laboratory of Physical and Digital Systems Engineering (LISPEN). Her research activities contribute to human-centered agile systems engineering in the context of Industry 5.0.Florian Magnani is an associate professor at Ecole Centrale Méditerranée and conducts research in operations,industrial organization and human resources at CERGAM (IAE Aix-Marseille). His current research focuses on the adoption of organizational innovations (Lean,Industry 4.0,Industry 5.0) and pays special attention to the human dimension of these innovations.Frédéric Rosin is a professor at Arts et Métiers within the LISPEN laboratory. He holds a Ph.D. in industrial engineering. His research focuses on new production models combining the benefits of operational excellence and Industry 5.0. He is the founder of DynEO,a learning-factory which integrates a factory lab.Laurent Joblot is a researcher at Arts et Métiers Cluny,holding a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering. He specializes in training and teaching LEAN principles through learning labs. Additionally,he explores the impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on human factors such as motivation,involvement,and decision-making,in manufacturing and construction sectors.Pierre-Majorique Léger is a full professor at HEC Montréal and holds the NSERC-Prompt Industrial Research Chair in User Experience. His research aims to improves the UX experienced when using information technology by mobilizing the biophysiological data generated during an interaction to qualify the user's emotion and cognition.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2319914
IF: 4.92
2024-03-05
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Abstract:The increased prevalence of human-AI collaboration is reshaping the manufacturing sector, fundamentally changing the nature of human work and training needs. While high automation improves performance when functioning correctly, it can lead to problematic human performance (e.g., defect detection accuracy, response time) when operators are required to intervene and assume manual control of decision-making responsibilities. As AI capability reaches higher levels of automation and human–AI collaboration becomes ubiquitous, addressing these performance issues is crucial. Proper worker training, focusing on skill-based, cognitive, and affective outcomes, and nurturing motivation and engagement, can be a mitigation strategy. However, most training research in manufacturing has prioritized the effectiveness of a technology for training, rather than how training design influences motivation and engagement, key to training success and longevity. The current study explored how training workers using an AI system affected their motivation, engagement, and skill acquisition. Specifically, we manipulated the level of automation of decision selection of an AI used for the training of 102 participants for a quality control task. Findings indicated that fully automated decision selection negatively impacted perceived autonomy, self-determined motivation, behavioral task engagement, and skill acquisition during training. Conversely, partially automated AI-enhanced motivation and engagement, enabling participants to better adapt to AI failure by developing necessary skills. The results suggest that involving workers in decision-making during training, using AI as a decision aid rather than a decision selector, yields more positive outcomes. This approach ensures that the human aspect of manufacturing work is not overlooked, maintaining a balance between technological advancement and human skill development, motivation, and engagement. These findings can be applied to enhance real-world manufacturing practices by designing training programs that better develop operators' technical, methodological, and personal skills, though companies may face challenges in allocating substantial resources for training redevelopment and continuously adapting these programs to keep pace with evolving technology.
computer science, cybernetics,ergonomics