SEX DIFFERENCES, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND AGEING: AN EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION APPROACH

Alexei A. Maklakov,Russell Bonduriansky,Robert C. Brooks
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00750.x
IF: 4.171
2009-10-01
Evolution
Abstract:Life-history (LH) theory predicts that selection will optimize the trade-off between reproduction and somatic maintenance. Reproductive ageing and finite life span are direct consequences of such optimization. Sexual selection and conflict profoundly affect the reproductive strategies of the sexes and thus can play an important role in the evolution of life span and ageing. In theory, sexual selection can favor the evolution of either faster or slower ageing, but the evidence is equivocal. We used a novel selection experiment to investigate the potential of sexual selection to influence the adaptive evolution of age-specific LH traits. We selected replicate populations of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus for age at reproduction ("Young" and "Old") either with or without sexual selection. We found that LH selection resulted in the evolution of age-specific reproduction and mortality but these changes were largely unaffected by sexual selection. Sexual selection depressed net reproductive performance and failed to promote adaptation. Nonetheless, the evolution of several traits differed between males and females. These data challenge the importance of current sexual selection in promoting rapid adaptation to environmental change but support the hypothesis that sex differences in LH-a historical signature of sexual selection-are key in shaping trait responses to novel selection.
ecology,genetics & heredity,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the role of sexual selection in the evolution of life - history (LH) characteristics, especially its impact on reproductive senescence and lifespan. Specifically, the author studied whether sexual selection can influence the adaptive evolution of age - specific life - history characteristics through the method of experimental evolution. ### Research Background and Problems 1. **Life - History Theory**: Life - history theory predicts that natural selection will optimize the trade - off between reproduction and somatic maintenance, leading to reproductive senescence and a limited lifespan. 2. **Sexual Selection and Conflict**: Sexual selection and sexual conflict deeply influence the reproductive strategies of both sexes, and thus may play an important role in the evolution of lifespan and senescence. Theoretically, sexual selection can promote faster or slower senescence, but the current evidence is not clear. 3. **Research Purpose**: This paper explores whether sexual selection can influence the adaptive evolution of age - specific life - history characteristics through the experimental evolution method, and evaluates the impact of sexual selection on the average population fitness and the speed of adaptation to environmental changes. ### Experimental Design - **Experimental Subjects**: Callosobruchus maculatus - **Selection Treatments**: - Age selection (LH selection): Divided into two treatments, "early reproduction" (Young) and "late reproduction" (Old). - Sexual selection opportunities: Divided into two treatments, sexual selection (Polygamy) and asexual selection (Monogamy). - **Experimental Design**: A 2×2 factorial design was adopted, with a total of 16 replicate groups, to study the effects of LH selection, sexual selection and their interactions on the evolution of life - history characteristics. ### Main Hypotheses 1. **LH Selection**: It is expected that late - reproduction selection (Old lines) will increase the intrinsic lifespan and the reproductive performance in later life, while early - reproduction selection (Young lines) will be the opposite. 2. **Sexual Selection**: It is expected that the removal of sexual selection will increase the average population fitness and accelerate the adaptation to new reproductive schedules. 3. **Gender Differences**: It is expected that the lifespan of males will respond more quickly to the selection of reproductive age because males can sacrifice lifespan to obtain more mating opportunities. ### Experimental Results 1. **Hatching Time and Larva - to - Adult Survival Rate**: The early - reproduction lines hatched faster and had a higher larva - to - adult survival rate. 2. **Lifespan of Virgin Individuals Reared Separately**: The individuals in the late - reproduction lines had a longer lifespan, and the lifespan of females was longer than that of males. There was a significant gender × LH selection interaction. 3. **Body Weight, Lifespan and Mortality of Virgin Groups**: Females were heavier than males, and the individuals in the late - reproduction lines were also heavier. The lifespan of females was longer than that of males, and there was a significant gender × LH selection interaction. 4. **Reproductive Arrangements and Lifespan of Paired Groups**: Different treatments had different effects on reproductive arrangements and lifespan, but overall, sexual selection had little impact on the evolution rate of life - history characteristics. ### Conclusions This study shows that life - history selection has led to the rapid adaptive evolution of most measured characteristics, but sexual selection has an inhibitory effect on the average population fitness and has a small impact on the rate of evolution of life - history characteristics. In addition, there are significant differences in the responses of different genders to life - history selection, supporting the important role of gender differences in the evolution of life - history characteristics. Through these studies, the author challenges the current importance of sexual selection in promoting rapid adaptation to environmental changes, but supports that the gender differences left by historical sexual selection are the key factors in shaping the responses of life - history characteristics to new types of selection.