Abstract:The topic of local and community governance has garnered increasing attention from researchers in recent years, with the resulting assessments generally identifying both the advantages and obstacles. On the positive side, collaborative community governance is often viewed as a new participatory space facilitating democratic practices with favourable social and relational outcomes. Conversely, the issues of power imbalances and the continued hierarchical influence of the central government are often cited as obstacles to genuine public engagement and horizontal collaboration among diverse actors. In particular, numerous studies argue that the governance structure and initial motivation exert significant influence over the governance processes and outcomes due to the different prioritisation of goals and strategies. Such considerations demonstrate the need for additional comparative studies in diverse contexts. In addition to addressing the limitation of the existing process-focused evaluations, this study proposes an analytic framework of collaborative community governance that identifies the multiple relationships between institutional setting, governance process and outcomes, and examines two community-building initiatives in Korea. The findings demonstrate that collaborative community governance worked as an experiential incubator for individual transformation, social and relational resource building and political empowerment. The comparative analysis of two different collaborative forms reveals that differences in structure and the mode of communication resulted in building different types of relational capital (bonding vs bridging). The lack of preliminary discussions and arrangement for institutional design is highlighted as a source of problems such as excessive dependency on particular communication modes, opaque system of representation and asymmetrical development of relational resources.

A comparative network analysis of the Korean Society of Journalism and Communication Studies (KSJCS) and the International Communication Association (ICA) in the era of hybridization

Comparing research topics in European and International Communication Association journals: Computational analysis

Co-authorship among the Fellows of the International Communication Association

A qualitative analysis of cross-cultural new media research: SNS use in Asia and the West

The Network of Chinese Journals in the Field of Journalism &Communication

Application status of qualitative comparative analysis methods in the international ISLS field based on social network analysis

Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals

A Media Sociology for the Networked Public Sphere: The Hierarchy of Influences Model

Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: an exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations

Comparative Study on Structure and Correlation among Author Co-Occurrence Networks in Bibliometrics

Network analysis reveals news press landscape and asymmetric user polarization

Journal of Computer Information Systems: Intellectual and Conceptual Structure

The Influence of Cultural Differences on the Use of Social Network Services and the Formation of Social Capital

Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea?

The workings of collaborative governance: Evaluating collaborative community-building initiatives in Korea

Exploring the Ideological Nature of Journalists' Social Networks on Twitter and Associations with News Story Content

Structure and evolution of online social relationships: Heterogeneity in warm discussions

Comparative Study On Structure And Correlation Among Bibliometrics Co-Occurrence Networks At Author-Level

The Concept of Hybridity in Journalism Studies

Analysis of Social Communication Network——A New Approach to Communication Studies

Utilising K-culture for Korean college students writing identity essays: online class cases