Abstract:Michel Agier’s Managing the Undesirables is one of several texts that addresses the complex and proliferating humanitarian infrastructure that is increasingly prevalent in regions of the world besieged by violence and displacement, but his work stands out as particularly important and innovative. Agier addresses some of the central questions facing our world today: belonging, personhood, and the ability of those most cut off from political power to speak for themselves and shape their own lives, and he does so in a way that combines passion and keen observation. In doing so, his work should be of interest to a broad range of sociologists who study social inequality and the structures (even those built from the best of intentions) that perpetuate it. In this volume, Agier explores the concept of humanitarian government, the political apparatus set up during emergency situations that takes responsibility for the life and death of individuals no longer protected adequately by a state. For as Agier shows, a refugee camp is far more than a place of shelters and emergency food aid. They are places in which someone decides who gets plastic sheeting and who does not, who receives food rations and for how long, what social programs should be put into place and who should be in charge of them, and what barriers need to be constructed (barbed wired, armed guards, cinderblock walls) to ostensibly protect those inside but also to protect the local population from incursions of these displaced ‘‘undesirables.’’ Further, these ‘‘camps’’ are hardly temporary shelters; many have existed for decades, taking on the appearance of towns and cities with entrepreneurs setting up small businesses and political elites emerging from the post-flight chaos. And yet, the camp is a hybrid social form, taking the shape of something entirely new from what existed before in the lives of its inhabitants, and as Agier convincingly argues, it exists in a state of exception, outside the bounds of the political and social life that humanitarian law and human rights ostensibly guarantee. Agier uses his ethnologist’s eye for culture to analyze observations he made during fieldwork in refugee camps in Kenya, Zambia, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea between 2000-2007, accessing the camps through Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF; in English, Doctors Without Borders). His affiliation with MSF gave him a level of flexibility and independence (particularly from the United Nations High Commission for Refugees) that allowed him sufficient time in the camps to not only observe humanitarian government at work but also the response of the refugees under its purview. He combines his observations with detailed histories of different migrations, explaining the historical and geographic paths that led different groups of refugees to the camps that he studied. Agier demonstrates the discursive power that humanitarian organizations have over defining and categorizing the displaced individuals in the camps; defining a person’s status as a refugee leads to acceptance into the camp and the security that brings, but the denial of such status leads to rejection and often deportation back to life-threatening circumstances. Once determined as a refugee, a person’s suffering and vulnerability come to define their place in the camp and the world, with moral hierarchies created around different definitions of vulnerability with different access to resources provided by the humanitarian organization. This process, Agier argues, de-socializes refugees; they lose their individual personhood and either become ahistorical, pitiable masses that the charitable-at-heart seek to keep alive, or potential threats to order and the safety of the non-displaced that must be managed or

The “problem” of the urban refugee: the African refugee regime and the Joint Refugee Services of Kenya, 1967–1982

Development of government policies and their implications on refugee protection in Kenya 1964 - 2016

Market Threads: How Cotton Farmers and Traders Create A Global Commodity

Repatriation: Its Role in Resolving Africa's Refugee Dilemma

The right to the city for urban refugees? Living in the shadow of the camp in Nairobi, Amman and Addis Ababa

From humanitarian crisis to employment crisis: The lives and livelihoods of South Sudanese refugee health workers in Uganda

Scoping Review of Health Economics Research on Refugee Health in Sub-Saharan Africa

Rural Poverty Dynamics and Refugee Communities in South Africa: A Spatial-Temporal Model

Determinants of Urban Refugee Youths Self-Reliance, in Nairobi City County, Kenya

Urban Congolese Refugees’ Social Capital and Community Resilience During a Period of Political Violence in Kenya: A Qualitative Study

Now you see them, now you don't: performance and the politics of localizing (forced) migration governance in the Horn of Africa's secondary cities

International Human Rights Law and the Protection of Refugees in the Modern World

Dispossession, social reproduction and the feminization of refugee survival: Ethiopian refugees in Nairobi, Kenya

Refugee Livelihoods: A Comparative Analysis of Nairobi and Kakuma Camp in Kenya.

Difficult Life in a Refugee Camp

Women refugees and sexual violence in Kakuma Camp, Kenya: Invisible rights, justice, protracted protection and human insecurity

"They stand in the middle now": Pathways to meeting psychological needs by adolescents who are refugees from sub-Saharan Africa

Refugee education: homogenized policy provisions and overlooked factors of disadvantage

The emergence and regression of political priority for refugee integration into the Jordanian health system: an analysis using the Kingdon's multiple streams model

Digital Banking by Urban Refugees in Sub-saharan Africa: A Case of Kenya

Grassroots refugee community organizations: In search of participatory urban governance