Abstract:Previous research suggested that socially anxious individuals might form threatening interpretations of positive facial stimuli. However, some studies failed to provide empirical evidence of an interpretation bias toward positive faces. These studies may have several methodological limitations that the present study attempted to overcome. And none of them assessed the interpretations bias, if existent, over time. The present study tried to figure out whether the socially anxious individuals were characterized by an interpretation bias towards positive facial stimuli, and investigated whether this interpretation bias tends to occur at an early stage in the interpretation process of positive stimuli, or it occurs at a later stage.The current study consisted of a 2 (stimulus duration type) × 2 (group type) mixed factorial design. The within-subjects factor of duration type had two levels (long vs. brief durations), and the between-subjects factor of group type had two levels (high vs. low social anxiety groups). Before the experiment, the participants first finished a package of questionnaires (SIAS, SPS, BFNE). Then, they were told that they would conduct an impromptu speaking task after the experiment, and their performance would be assessed. The participants were made convinced that the experiment was about to test their social and presentation skills. After the experiment, no speaking task would be performed. They were debriefed and explained about the design. In the experiment, a positive face and a matched neutral face were presented on the screen at the same time for each trial. The participants, who scored high and low on the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale, were instructed to imagine that these faces represented the audience in their coming speaking task, and they were asked to identify the facial displays that they subjectively perceived to be more threatening. The matched positive and neutral facial displays were presented at both long (unlimited) and brief (60ms) stimulus durations. By doing so, interpretation biases to perceiving threat in positive facial stimuli were assessed over time under the public speaking situation. The numbers of the positive facial displays, which were chosen to be more threatening when compared with the neutral ones, were recorded by the program. The dependent variables were analyzed with repeated measure ANOVA.The results showed that the high-social-anxiety participants chose significantly more positive facial stimuli than the low-social-anxiety participants at long stimulus durations, while no difference between groups was found at brief stimulus durations. We come to the conclusion that in contrast to the control group the high-social-anxiety participants are characterized by an interpretation bias towards positive facial stimuli, and are more likely to perceive them in a more threatening way in social interaction. It also suggests that only at long durations, the participants with high vs. low social anxiety tended to interpret positive facial stimuli in different fashions. Based on these findings, we then propose that this interpretation bias for positive facial displays in socially anxious individuals may occur at a later stage in the interpretation process of positive stimuli.

Interpretation Bias for Ambiguous Social Behavior Among Individuals with High and Low Levels of Social Anxiety

Interpretation bias and social anxiety: does interpretation bias mediate the relationship between trait social anxiety and state anxiety responses?

Effects of Social Anxiety Level on Negative Interpretation Bias in Ambiguous Social Situations: Focused on Relational Intimacy

Interpretation bias and social anxiety in adolescents

Social Anxiety and Interpretation Bias: Effect of Positive Priming.

Interpretative biases for positive faces in high socially anxious individuals

Interpretation Biases for Positive Facial Stimuli in Social Anxiety

Interpretation of ambiguous emotional information in clinically anxious children and adolescents

Anxious youth and adults share threat-biased interpretations of linguistic and visual ambiguity: A proof of concept study

Interpretation Bias in Online and Offline Social Environments and Associations with Social Anxiety, Peer Victimization, and Avoidance Behavior

Social Evaluation in Emerging Adults: Associations with Interpretation Bias and Perceived Social Support

Reliability of an Interpretation Bias Task of Ambiguous Faces and Its Relationship with Social Anxiety, Depression, and Looming Maladaptive Style

Attentional Bias in Social Anxious Individuals

Attention allocation in social anxiety during a speech

Excessive avoidance bias towards uncertain faces in non-clinical social anxiety individuals

The Relationship Between Hostile Interpretation Bias and Symptoms of Depression and Social Anxiety: a Replication Across Two Samples

The effect of anxiety and its interplay with social cues when perceiving aggressive behaviours

Cultural evidence for interpretation bias as a feature of social anxiety in Chinese adolescents.

Self-focused attention vs. negative attentional bias during public speech task in socially anxious individuals.

Looking Through Tinted Glasses: Depression and Social Anxiety Are Related to Both Interpretation Biases and Inflexible Negative Interpretations

A single‐session feedback training modifies interpretation bias in individuals with high social anxiety: A randomized controlled trial