Abstract:Fourteen pairs of twins were selected on the basis of their high scores on The Exceptional Experiences Questionnaire (EEQ ), which documents the frequency and intensity of telepathic and synchronistic experiences amongst twins. The twins alternated in the role of sender in which they were exposed to a surprise or shock stimulus and in the role of receiver in which their electrodermal activity (EDA) was monitored. Sender and receiver were placed in laboratory rooms at remote ends of a building separated by distance and barriers ensuring sensory isolation. Twins in the role of sender were presented with a series of surprise or shock stimuli during the period randomly selected for presentation. This was one out of the 8 periods occurring in the block of 5 minutes. Within the selected period, the actual presentation lasted 30 seconds and occurred at approximately the midpoint of the period. The stimulus presentation in this block of 5 minutes was repeated 5 times making thereby a 25-minute session for each twin belonging to the sender-receiver pair. During this session, the other twin in the role of receiver, had been equipped with electrodes recording EDA and otherwise advised to relax during the session. The task for the judge in the studies was to use the electrophysiological data from the non-shocked twin to identify the exact periods when the stimuli had been exposed to the sending twin. The EDA from 91 useable presentations were displayed and analysed for the purpose of locating any peak EDA response in each of the possible eight periods corresponding to the stimuli exposure times. Correct identifications would thus occur by chance one in eight times. The attempts at these identifications were carried out by GB, a researcher experienced at EDA interpretation but blind as to the periods that had been chosen for the stimulus exposure. The findings from the three experimental studies showed there were 18 correct identifications out of the total 91 stimulus exposures (MCE = 11.4), which reached statistical significance on a one-tailed t-test ( p = .043), and with a binomial test ( p = .03, one-tailed). However, only one of the three studies reached significance, in this case at the same level as the collective results ( p = .043, one-tailed). Two explanations for this are the observed variability in the task-performances of the pairs of twins and in the differences in the sources of the twins for each of the studies. The results of a questionnaire entitled ' Experiences in Close Relationships' (ECR), adapted for twin relationships to assess their degree of attachment, indicated that those twins with many "correct identifications of epochs from the EDA" were not significantly different from the others on this measure of attachment. However, it should be noted that the twins here according to the ECR all had close emotional relationships to each other, thereby giving too little variation to adequately test the hypotheses concerning the role of attachment. The data provides justification for carrying out further studies using this methodology and furthermore that pairs of twins should be used with greater variation in attachment measures. The results are briefly discussed in the context of recent findings concerning the neuropsychology of experiences of synchronicity.

The Babytwins Study Sweden (BATSS): A Multi-Method Infant Twin Study of Genetic and Environmental Factors Influencing Infant Brain and Behavioral Development

Twins' Early Development Study (TEDS): A Multivariate, Longitudinal Genetic Investigation of Language, Cognition and Behavior Problems from Childhood Through Adolescence

Longitudinal Research at the Interface of Affective Neuroscience, Developmental Psychopathology, Health and Behavioral Genetics: Findings from the Wisconsin Twin Project

Protocol for a Longitudinal Twin Birth Cohort Study to Unravel the Complex Interplay Between Early-Life Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors in Health and Disease: the Chongqing Longitudinal Twin Study (Lotis)

Multimodal brain imaging in autism spectrum disorder and the promise of twin research

A Twin Study about Genetic Effects on Mental Health Development of Children

Association between twin status with cognitive, behavioral development and brain structure in early adolescence: a retrospective cohort analysis based on the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

Genetic and environmental influences on structural brain development from childhood to adolescence: A longitudinal twin study on cortical thickness, surface area, and subcortical volume

Development of mental health of the 104 adolescents: a twin study

The Queensland Twin Adolescent Brain Project, a longitudinal study of adolescent brain development

An Experiment With Three Studies Of Physiological Connectedness Amongst Twins And Its Possible Relationship To Attachment

Transcriptomic and Metabolomic analyses in Monozygotic and Dizygotic twins.

Twins Methods Quantitatively Explore the Genetic Impact on Children and Adolescents Brain Gray Matter Volume

The Southern Illinois Twins/Triplets and Siblings Study (SITSS): A Longitudinal Study of Early Child Development

Eight-year follow-up of cognitive development in 33 twin pairs

Abstract P528: Modifiable Factors Affecting BP in Identical Twins

Twin Study of the Genetic and Family Environmental Effects on Children Personality

A twin study of genetic effects on intelligence development of children and adolescents

Genetic and Environmental Influences on the Mental Health of Children: A Twin Study.

Preferential looking to eyes versus mouth in early infancy: heritability and link to concurrent and later development

The CODATwins Project: The Current Status and Recent Findings of COllaborative Project of Development of Anthropometrical Measures in Twins