Abstract:Background: Understanding the causes and mechanisms underlying musculoskeletal pain is crucial for developing effective treatments and improving patient outcomes. Self-report measures, such as the Pain Drawing Scale, involve individuals rating their level of pain on a scale. In this technique, individuals color the area where they experience pain, and the resulting picture is rated based on the depicted pain intensity. Analyzing pain drawings typically involves measuring the size of the pain region. There are several studies focusing on assessing the clinical utility of PDs, and now, with the introduction of digital PDs, the usability and reliability of these platforms needed validation. Comparative studies between traditional and digital PDs have shown good agreement and reliability. The evolution of PD acquisition over the last two decades mirrors the commercialization of digital technologies. However, the pen-on-paper approach seems to be more accepted by patients but there is currently no standardized method for scanning pain drawings. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pain drawing analysis performed by a web platform using various digital scanners. The primary goal was to demonstrate that simple and affordable mobile devices can be used to acquire pain drawings without losing important information. Methods: Two sets of pain drawings were generated: one with the addition of 216 colored circles, and another composed of various red shapes, distributed randomly on a frontal view body chart of an adult male. These drawings were then printed in color on A4 sheets including QR codes at the corners in order to allow automatic alignment and subsequently scanned using different devices and apps. The scanners used were both flatbed scanners of different sizes and prices (professional, portable flatbed, and home printer/scanner), and smartphones with varying price ranges, and six virtual scanner apps. The acquisitions were made under normal light conditions by the same operator. Results: High saturation colors, such as red, cyan, magenta, and yellow, were accurately identified by all devices. The percentage error for small, medium, and large pain spots was consistently below 20% for all devices, with smaller values associated with larger areas. Additionally, a significant negative correlation was observed between the percentage of error and spot size (R=-0.237, P=0.0402). The proposed platform proved to be robust and reliable for acquiring paper pain drawings using a wide range of scanning devices. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that a web platform can accurately analyze pain drawings acquired through various digital scanners. Conclusions: The findings support the use of simple and cost-effective mobile devices for pain drawing acquisition, without compromising the quality of data. Standardizing the scanning process using the proposed platform can contribute to more efficient and consistent pain drawing analysis in clinical and research settings.

Faces of Pain during Dental Procedures: Reliability of Scoring Facial Expressions in Print Art

Reliability of three pain assessment tools in children requiring dental treatment: A comparative clinical study

Validity and reliability of the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition 15 (PAIC15) observation scale in persons with aphasia

Associations between facial expressions and observational pain in residents with dementia and chronic pain

Assessment of Perception of Pain with E-Speed Film, CCD Sensor and Photostimulable Phosphor Plates for Intraoral Radiographs in Children using Three Pain Rating Scales

"Do not look at me like that": Is the facial expression score reliable and accurate to evaluate pain in large domestic animals? A systematic review

The Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition scale (PAIC15): A multidisciplinary and international approach to develop and test a meta‐tool for pain assessment in impaired cognition, especially dementia

A software‐based observational coding approach for evaluating paediatric dental pain, anxiety, and fear

A visual analog scale to measure psychological and physical pain: A preliminary validation of the PPP-VAS in two independent samples of depressed patients

Faces of clinical pain: Inter-individual facial activity patterns in shoulder pain patients

Simulation of three intraoral radiographic techniques in pediatric dental patients: subjective comfort assessment using the VAS and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Raiting Scale

Dental Anxiety Assessment through the Drawings of Children and Influence of Art Therapy

Objectively measuring pain using facial expression: is the technology finally ready?

Content validity of the electronic faces thermometer scale for pain in children: is a picture worth more than a thousand words?

A distributed brain response predicting the facial expression of acute nociceptive pain

Objective assessment of chronic pain in donkeys using the Donkey Chronic Pain Scale

Physiological Biomarkers for Assessment of Pain during Routine Blood Tests for Older Adults with Dementia in Long-Term Residential Care

Assessment of pain in paediatric dental patients during administration of local anesthesia with and without the use of audiovisual distraction

Automated Pain Spots Recognition Algorithm Provided by a Web Service–Based Platform: Instrument Validation Study

Reporting the Location and Extent of Pain in Adolescents: A Test-Retest Reliability Study

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale