Abstract:ABSTRACTMany institutions in higher education are experimenting with hybrid teaching approaches to undergraduate courses. Online resources may provide a number of advantages to students as compared to in-class approaches. Research regarding the effectiveness of hybrid approaches is mixed and still accumulating. This paper discusses the use of a hybrid teaching approach for a Managerial Economics class. Identical multiple-choice questions from previous semesters are used to compare student performance in hybrid classes versus traditionally taught classes. Results suggest that student performance is lower in hybrid classes as compared to traditional classes. The differing student performance suggests that the complexity of material in some courses may not be suitable for a hybrid approach.Keywords: Economics, business, teaching, flipped instruction, hybrid instructionJEL Classification: A22 ; M00PsycINFO Classification: 3530FoR Code: 1301; 1501IntroductionThere has been an increasing use of technology in higher education. Many institutions have experimented with "hybrid" or "flipped" courses which substitute online exercises and resources for class time. Overall, such hybrid approaches have generally shown mixed results (Akkoyunlu & Soylu, 2008; Ginns 8i Ellis, 2007; Love, Hodge, Grandgenett, & Swift, 2014).Online resources may present several advantages over traditional lecture and discussion. First, students can utilize online resources at a time of their choosing. Second, online assignments often have multiple attempts. Third, online assignments are by default open-book. Fourth, students can engage in discussion with other students for online assignments.If the online resources work as predicted, a hybrid approach could increase student learning at the same time that it decreases instructor time for delivering lecture in the classroom. Thus, this approach could be beneficial for both parties. The hybrid approach may also reduce cost if more students could be served with this approach. The primary Research Question is whether a hybrid teaching approach could improve student learning in a Managerial Economics class. The method for evaluating this question is to compare student performance on identical multiple-choice questions from previous semesters (taught by the same instructor). Other secondary topics of interest are overall student satisfaction with a hybrid course, and the potential increased load on the instructor for preparation and administration. This paper discusses the results of this trial.Literature ReviewHybrid or blended learning seeks to improve learning through a combination of face-to-face instructional time and online instructional time (Garrison 8i Kanuka, 2004). Blended learning can take a number of forms but relies on basic educational principles (Garrison 8i Vaughan, 2008). Effective practices in blended learning have also been identified (Mortera-Gutierrez, 2006).Hybrid or blended approaches have been used in a variety of business courses, including graduate business courses (Chen & Jones, 2007). As mentioned above, the overall results from hybrid or blended courses have been mixed as far as student performance, and that is the case in the field of business as well. A hybrid approach for an undergraduate accounting course improved student performance (Dowling, Godfrey, & Gyles, 2003). A hybrid approach to introductory economics showed no change in student performance (Olitsky, & Cosgrove, 2014). In an undergraduate microeconomics course, student performance was weaker in a hybrid section as compared to a face-to-face section (Verhoeven, & Rudchenko, 2013).Other studies have looked at student perception and satisfaction with hybrid courses. In the study of a hybrid marketing planning course versus the traditional, students preferred the traditional course (Haytko, 2001). A study in undergraduate economics showed the availability of online tools in a blended course improved student motivation (Van Der Merwe, 2007). …

Student Performance: Assessment Centers Versus Traditional Classroom Evaluation Techniques

Perceptions of assessment center exercises: between exercises differences and interventions

A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Student Achievement Using Standardized and Performance-Based Tests

Are Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness Valid for Measuring Student Learning Outcomes in Business Related Classes? A Neural Network and Bayesian Analyses

Blending Individual and Group Assessment: A Model for Measuring Student Performance

Assessment centers do not measure competencies: why this is now beyond reasonable doubt

Evaluation of the role of incentive structure on student participation and performance in active learning strategies: A comparison of case-based and team-based learning

Improving Performance in Accounting: Evidence for Insisting on Cognitive Conflict Tasks

Assessment as Learning: How Does Peer Assessment Function in Students' Learning?

How to assess? Student preferences for methods to assess experiential learning: A best-worst scaling approach

Making the grade? A meta-analysis of academic performance as a predictor of work performance and turnover

Course evaluation scores: valid measures for teaching effectiveness or rewards for lenient grading?

A Hybrid Approach to Teaching Managerial Economics

Assessment of University Students’ Critical Thinking: Next Generation Performance Assessment

The Expert Assessor Perspective on Assessment Center Taxonomies

Assessing Selected Teaching Techniques and Their Impact on Student Success in the Classroom

Exploring internal structure of a performance-based critical thinking assessment for new students in higher education

Effects of Behavioral Anchors on Peer Evaluation Reliability

Assessing Teachers’ Classroom Management Competency: A Case Study of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System–Secondary

Participation and performance on paper- and computer-based low-stakes assessments

Performance evaluation in teaching: Dissecting student evaluations in higher education