Experiments Using Capillary Mat as Ground Heat Exchanger for Ground Source Heat Pump Heating Application
Widiatmojo Arif,Gaurav Shrestha,Ishihara Takeshi,Tomigashi Akira,Yasukawa Kasumi,Uchida Youhei,Kaneko Shohei,Yoshioka Mayumi,Arif Widiatmojo,Shrestha Gaurav,Takeshi Ishihara,Akira Tomigashi,Kasumi Yasukawa,Youhei Uchida,Shohei Kaneko,Mayumi Yoshioka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2019.1111024
2019-01-01
Energy and Power Engineering
Abstract:The cooling and heating of spaces are among the largest sources for household’s energy demand. Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) is a promising technology to reduce the energy for cooling and heating purposes. However, the major obstacle hindering the utilization of this technology is the high initial cost, especially for the installation of ground coupled heat exchanger. The horizontal closed-loop system offers lower installation cost, as it requires no vertical borehole construction. Instead, the heat exchangers can be installed in shallow trenches that may be excavated, by small excavator or even by hu man labor. This paper presents the comparison of two different heat exc hangers, namely, the capillary mat and the widely used slinky pipe. Both heat exchangers are connected to a heat pump, where continuous heating tests were carried out for 165 hours (~7 days) for each configuration. The purpose of this research is to show the performance of capillary mat in comparison to slinky pipe. Despite during the entire test for capillary mat required 6% higher electricity consumption, compared to slinky heat exchanger, the results still suggest the potential use of capillary mat as alternative to slinky heat exchanger. Additionally, the results also highlight the high hydraulic resistance of installed capillary mat heat exchangers may become the major disadvantage of the capillary mat.
English Else