Financial Regulation after the Global Recession

Carlos M. Peláez,Carlos A. Peláez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230251243

2009-01-01

Abstract:The failure on the part of Banks to enforce rigorous self regulation has precipitated a deep and prolonged global recession. This book provides a comprehensive review of principles, institutions and experience of financial regulation, to help illustrate current regulatory proposals.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

On the Prudential Regulation of Banks —theories, Institutions and Trends

Wang Jin-min,Shi Jin-chuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/bf02840568

2001-01-01

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A

Abstract:Banking regulation has been one of the key issues affecting the financial and economic stability around the world. The worldwide economic crisis in the 1930s and the constant financial turmoil since the 1990s have aroused the world's attention towards how to prevent and handle the negative financial effects smoothly. The accelerating and deepening of financial globalization extends the perspectives of financial regulation to the cross-border scope. This thesis focuses on the latest development of banking regulation after the Asian financial turmoil and the challenges of international banking regulation. The outlook and challenges of financial regulation after China's accession to WTO are discussed.
Financial Regulation: Still Unsettled a Decade After the Crisis

D. Tarullo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/JEP.33.1.61

IF: 9.9439

2019-02-01

Journal of Economic Perspectives

Abstract:A decade after the darkest moments of the financial crisis, both the US financial system and the legal framework for its regulation are still in flux. The post-crisis regulatory framework has made systemically important banks much more resilient. They are substantially better capitalized and less dependent on runnable short-term funding. But the current regulatory framework does not deal effectively with threats to financial stability outside the perimeter of regulated banking organizations, notably from forms of shadow banking. Moreover, with the political tide having for the moment turned decisively toward deregulation, there is some question whether the resiliency improvements of the largest banks will be preserved. This article assesses the accomplishments, unfinished business, and outstanding issues in the post-crisis approach to prudential regulation.

Economics,Law,Political Science,Business
Banking regulation in the United States after the world economic crisis of 2007/2008: economic immunity or false hopes

Daniela Freddo,Sulafa Nofal,Juliano Vargas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33834/bkr.v8i2.288

2022-12-26

Brazilian Keynesian Review

Abstract:Based on the Post-Keynesian approach, we argue that commercial banks, through the financial reforms of 1980 and 1999, which made financial institutions more flexible, increased their capacity to operate in the capital market by becoming Banking Financial Holding Companies. The 2007/2008 crisis is understood as a consequence of financial deregulation and financial innovation process that weakened the Federal Reserve's capacity to restrain banking activity. Initially, we discuss the new institutional context that emerged from these changes in the financial regulatory framework between 1980 and 1999. Then, we focus on how financial deregulation allowed banking business to advance in financial markets, how this process contributed to the economic crisis of 2007, characterized both as a liquidity crisis and a solvency crisis, safeguarded by the National States. Finally, we analyze the Dodd-Frank Law (2010), which is interpreted as the reaffirmation of this endogenous process of financial domination.
The Role of Law and Regulation in Sustaining Financial Markets

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315796390

2014-11-13

Abstract:This book explores the role of law and regulation in sustaining financial markets in both developed and developing countries, particularly the European Union, United States and China. The central argument of this book is that law matters for the operation of financial markets, which, in turn, significantly influences the performance of firms, industries, and economies. The Role of Law and Regulation in Sustaining Financial Markets is divided into four parts. Part one addresses the connection between law, financial development, and economic growth. Part two deals with the role of financial regulation, which can be used to correct market failures, such as negative externalities, information asymmetries, and monopolies. Part three focuses on the design, functioning, and performance of different financial instruments. Part four examines the topic of Corporate Social Responsibility. This book contributes to the ‘law and finance’ literature by studying certain conventional issues, such as the relationship between finance and economic growth, and the effects of regulatory quality on financial development, from new perspectives and/or with new evidence, data, and cases. It also explores novel topics, such as project finance contracts, insurance and climate change, the shadow banking system, that have been overlooked in current literature. This book is meaningful not only for the EU and the US, which have suffered considerably from the financial crisis of 2008, but also for China, which is struggling to build a sound institutional infrastructure to govern its increasingly complicated financial system. By comparing the regulatory philosophies and practices of the EU, the US and China, this book will help the reader to understand the diverse nature of the global ‘law and finance’ nexus and avoid succumbing to the myth of "one size fits all".
The UK and Multi-level Financial Regulation

Scott James,Lucia Quaglia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198828952.001.0001

2020-02-06

Abstract:The book examines the role of the United Kingdom (UK) in shaping post-crisis financial regulatory reform, and assesses the implications of the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union (EU). It develops a domestic political economy approach to examine how the interaction of three domestic groups—elected officials, financial regulators, and the financial industry—shaped UK preferences, strategy, and influence in international and EU-level regulatory negotiations. The framework is applied to five case studies: bank capital and liquidity requirements; bank recovery and resolution rules; bank structural reforms; hedge fund regulation; and the regulation of over-the-counter derivatives. We conclude by reflecting on the future of UK financial regulation after Brexit. The book argues that UK regulators pursued more stringent regulation when they had strong political support to resist financial industry lobbying. UK regulators promoted international harmonization of rules when this protected the competitiveness of industry or enabled cross-border externalities to be managed more effectively, but were often more resistant to new EU rules when these threatened UK interests. Consequently, the UK was more successful at shaping international standards by leveraging its market power, regulatory capacity, and alliance-building (with the US). But it often met with greater political resistance at the EU level, forcing it to use legal challenges to block reform or secure exemptions. The book concludes that political and regulatory pressure was pivotal in defining the UK’s ‘hard’ Brexit position, and so the future UK–EU relationship in finance will most likely be based on a framework of regulatory equivalence.
The Political Economy of Bank Regulation in Developing Countries: Risk and Reputation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841999.001.0001

2020-03-19

Abstract:Why do governments in some developing countries implement international standards, while others do not? Focusing on the politics of bank regulation, this book develops a new framework to explain regulatory interdependence between countries in the core and the periphery of the global financial system. Drawing on in-depth analysis of eleven countries across Africa, Asia, and Latin America, it shows how financial globalization generates strong reputational and competitive incentives for developing countries to converge on international standards. Regulatory interdependence is generated by relations between regulators, politicians, and banks within developing countries, and international actors including investors, peer regulators, and international financial institutions. We explain why it is that some configurations of domestic politics and forms of integration into global finance generate convergence with international standards, while other configurations lead to divergence. This book contributes to our understanding of the ways in which governments and firms in the core of global finance powerfully shape regulatory politics in the periphery, and the ways in which peripheral governments and firms manoeuvre within the constraints and opportunities created by financial globalization.
Financial Crisis, Corporate Governance, and Bank Capital

Sanjai Bhagat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316756669

2017-01-01

Abstract:In the aftermath of the 2007–8 crisis, senior policymakers and the media have blamed excessive risk-taking undertaken by bank executives, in response to their compensation incentives, for the crisis. The inevitable follow-up to this was to introduce stronger financial regulation, in the hope that better and more ethical behaviour can be induced. Despite the honourable intentions of regulation, such as the Dodd–Frank Act of 2010, it is clear that many big banks are still deemed too big to fail. This book argues that by restructuring executive incentive programmes to include only restricted stock and restricted stock options with very long vesting periods, and financing banks with considerably more equity, the potential of future financial crises can be minimized. It will be of great value to corporate executives, corporate board members, institutional investors and economic policymakers, as well as graduate and undergraduate students studying finance, economics and law.
Market crises, the financial system and the real economy: Analysis and implications for the global financial services industry

Claudio Scardovi,Stefano Gatti,Damiano Ventola

DOI: https://doi.org/10.69554/nyte1325

2010-06-01

Abstract:Across the world, the deep and unexpected crisis within the global financial sector has quickly spread through to the real economy. To understand the mechanisms of contagion between the financial sector and the real economy, this paper begins by presenting a summary of the most important facts from the last 24 months. It then proposes some preliminary hypotheses regarding possible mechanisms to improve the stability of the financial services sector. Finally, the analysis examines potential solutions for the crisis in those major developed countries that envisage major public intervention. The paper also considers the implicit and explicit risks for the economies of the countries involved.
What Happened: Financial Factors in the Great Recession

Mark Gertler,Simon Gilchrist

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.3.3

IF: 9.9439

2018-08-01

Journal of Economic Perspectives

Abstract:At the onset of the recent global financial crisis, the workhorse macroeconomic models assumed frictionless financial markets. These frameworks were thus not able to anticipate the crisis, nor to analyze how the disruption of credit markets changed what initially appeared like a mild downturn into the Great Recession. Since that time, an explosion of both theoretical and empirical research has investigated how the financial crisis emerged and how it was transmitted to the real sector. The goal of this paper is to describe what we have learned from this new research and how it can be used to understand what happened during the Great Recession. In the process, we also present some new empirical work. We argue that a complete description of the Great Recession must take account of the financial distress facing both households and banks and, as the crisis unfolded, nonfinancial firms as well. Exploiting both panel data and time series methods, we analyze the contribution of the house price decline, versus the banking distress indicator, to the overall decline in employment during the Great Recession. We confirm a common finding in the literature that the household balance sheet channel is important for regional variation in employment. However, we also find that the disruption in banking was central to the overall employment contraction.

economics
Great Recession and Macroeconomic Theory: A Useless Crisis?

Giancarlo Bertocco,Andrea Kalajzić

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2020.1714202

2019-07-03

Review of Political Economy

Abstract:The global financial crisis of 2007–08 and the subsequent Great Recession have pushed many economists to acknowledge a fundamental limit in the theoretical models elaborated after the monetarist counter-revolution: these models disregard the financial system. The years following the Great Recession have thus been marked by the development of what can be called the 'Financial Frictions Approach', a theoretical approach based on the addition of the financial system to the New Keynesian DSGE model. The results of this line of research are beginning to appear also in macroeconomics textbooks. Significant examples are the publication of the seventh edition of Blanchard's textbook, and the publication of the third edition of the textbook co-authored by Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi. The objective of this work is twofold: (i) to show that the new model presented by Blanchard, Amighini and Giavazzi, which reflects the results of the 'Financial Frictions Approach', does not allow to elaborate a coherent explanation of the Great Recession and (ii) to present the pillars of an alternative theoretical model based on the lessons of Keynes, Schumpeter and Minsky.
Global Finance of the Post-Crisis Times:Its Supervision and Adjustment

Lingyan Xu,He Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8284.2014.07.027

2014-01-01

Abstract:After the subprime crisis quieted down,major economic giants of global financial system conducted new reform. In the changes,systematic risk management,enhanced control of high-risk financial derivative system came to the key. However,in the supervision,there are several problems,such as financial regulation that impacts the overall capital system in procyclicality,the supervision under mechanism of company govern-ance and compensation incentive system,which form the major contents in the adjustment and improvement of the reform system. Among them,procyclicality of financial supervision,incentive mechanism of financial or-gans and global cooperation draw attentions from supervision regulators of each country. The solution to these issues to some extent reflects the trend of global supervision,influencing global financial market deeply.
Global Financial Regulation: Shortcomings and Reform Options

Emily Jones,Peter Knaack

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12656

2019-02-18

Global Policy

Abstract:Abstract Standard‐setting bodies in global finance follow a core‐periphery logic, imposing a rigid dichotomy between standard‐setters and standard‐takers. They also focus exclusively on promoting financial stability. We argue that both attributes are increasingly problematic in today's world of globalised finance. Developing countries outside of standard‐setting bodies are highly integrated into global finance and while they are not systemically important, they are greatly affected by the regulatory decisions taken in the core. Analysing Basel banking standards, we show how the two‐tier structure of decision‐making results in international standards that generate adverse implications for countries in the periphery, particularly developing countries. Focusing on debates over the regulation of non‐bank credit intermediation, we show how the exclusive focus on financial stability can operate to the detriment of other important policy objectives, including financial inclusion. To improve the efficacy of international standard setting we make a series of recommendations aimed at increasing the applicability of standards to a wide variety of jurisdictions, and widening the focus of standard‐setting beyond financial stability. We also propose the creation of a new standard‐setting body for the regulation of fintech that models a more inclusive and holistic approach.Greater efforts at fostering collaboration between developing country regulators could also help strengthen alliances among developing countries, enabling them to coordinate more effectively and thereby exert greater influence in global standard‐setting processes.

political science,international relations
THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AND THE SYSTEMIC FAILURE OF THE ECONOMICS PROFESSION

David Colander,Michael Goldberg,Armin Haas,Katarina Juselius,Alan Kirman,Thomas Lux,Brigitte Sloth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810902934109

2009-01-01

Critical Review

Abstract:Economists not only failed to anticipate the financial crisis; they may have contributed to it—with risk and derivatives models that, through spurious precision and untested theoretical assumptions, encouraged policy makers and market participants to see more stability and risk sharing than was actually present. Moreover, once the crisis occurred, it was met with incomprehension by most economists because of models that, on the one hand, downplay the possibility that economic actors may exhibit highly interactive behavior; and, on the other, assume that any homogeneity will involve economic actors sharing the economist’s own putatively correct model of the economy, so that error can stem only from an exogenous shock. The financial crisis presents both an ethical and an intellectual challenge to economics, and an opportunity to reform its study by grounding it more solidly in reality.

political science
Why Financial Regulation Keeps Falling Short

Dan Awrey,Kathryn Judge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3530056

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This article argues that there is a fundamental mismatch between the nature of finance and current approaches to financial regulation. Today’s financial system is a dynamic and complex ecosystem. For these and other reasons, policy makers and market actors regularly have only a fraction of the information that may be pertinent to decisions they are making. The processes governing financial regulation, however, implicitly assume a high degree of knowability, stability, and predictability. Through two case studies and other examples, this article examines how this mismatch undermines financial stability and other policy aims. This examination further reveals that the procedural rules meant to promote accountability and legitimacy often fail to further either end. They result instead in excessive expenditures before new rules are adopted, counterproductive efforts to perfect ever more detailed rules, and too little re-evaluation of existing rules in light of new information or changed circumstances. The mismatch between the nature of finance and how finance is regulated helps to explain why financial regulation has failed in the past and why it will likely fail again. It also suggests the need for a new approach to financial regulation, one that acknowledges the limits of what can be known given the realities of today’s complex and constantly evolving financial ecosystem.
Network-Sensitive Financial Regulation

Luca Enriques,Alessandro Romano,Thom Wetzer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3411828

2019-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Shocks that hit part of the financial system, such as the subprime mortgage market in 2007, can propagate through a complex network of interconnections among financial and non-financial institutions. As the financial crisis of 2007-2009 has shown, the consequences for the entire economy of such systemic risk materializing can be catastrophic. Following the crisis, economists and policymakers have become increasingly aware that the structure of the financial system is a key determinant of systemic risk. A wide consensus now exists among them that network theory is the natural framework for studying systemic risk. Yet, most of the existing rules in financial regulation are still “atomistic,” in that they fail to incorporate the fact that each individual institution is part of a wider network. This article shows that policies building upon insights from network theory (network-sensitive policies) can address systemic risk more effectively than traditional atomistic policies, also in areas where an atomistic approach would seem natural, such as the corporate governance of systemically important financial institutions. In particular, we consider four prescriptions for the governance of systemically important institutions (one on directors’ liability, two on executive compensation and one on failing financial institutions’ shareholders appraisal rights in mergers) and show how making them network-sensitive would both increase their effectiveness in taming systemic risk and better calibrate their impact on individual institutions.
Subprime Crisis and Regulatory Responses

Mohan Qin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v46i.5089

2023-06-08

BCP Business & Management

Abstract:The 2008 financial crisis brought about the worst economic depression since World War II. This paper covers the three main components of the economic meltdown, along with its cause, consequences, and countermeasures. The crisis emerged against a backdrop of rapidly expanding credit, high risk-taking, and heightened financial leverage. In particular, factors related to the real estate bubble are discussed, among which the subprime mortgage crisis has received widespread attention. The various impacts caused by the crisis are irreversible and affect the financial market to this day. Therefore, discussing various measures after the crisis is helpful to the development of the financial field. Whether it is analyzing monetary policy or fiscal policy, or the ever-renewing Basel Accords, they all help to improve global imbalances. Although the financial crisis emerges in the American market first, its widespread impact is beyond the scope. In this paper, the whole development of the 2008 financial crisis will be deeply discussed.
Triple Crises and Law Response in the Financial Tsunami

Lou Jianbo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-5833.2009.06.011

2009-01-01

Journal of Social Sciences

Abstract:The current financial tsunami consists of triple crises,i.e.,the sub-prime loan crisis,the structure finance crisis and the crisis of financial globalization. They take place respectively in the normal financial market,the derivatives market and international financial market. The paper argues that three levels of financial crisis have posed different challenges on current legal infrastructure,at both domestic and international levels,relevant to both regulatory regime and commercial/private law regime. It suggests that the law should respond in the following three perspectives,i.e.,the reform of the Bretton Woods system,the improvement of financial regulation,and importantly but unfortunately ignored,the reshuffling of commercial/private law governing financial transactions.
Global Imbalances and the Financial Crisis: Reassessing the Role of International Finance

Claudio BORIO,Piti DISYATAT

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-3131.2010.01163.x

IF: 3

2010-11-25

Asian Economic Policy Review

Abstract:Global current account imbalances have recently been singled out by many as a key factor contributing to the global financial crisis. Current account surpluses in several emerging market economies are said to have put significant downward pressure on world interest rates, thereby fueling a credit boom and risk taking in major advanced economies with current account deficits (the “excess saving” view). We argue that this perspective on global imbalances bears reconsideration. We highlight two conceptual problems: (i) explaining market interest rates through the saving‐investment framework; and (ii) drawing inferences about a country's cross‐border financing activity based on observations of net capital flows. We trace the shortcomings of this perspective to a failure to consider the distinguishing characteristics of a monetary (credit) economy. We conjecture that the main macroeconomic cause of the financial crisis was not “excess saving” but the “excess elasticity” of the international monetary and financial system.

economics
National and International Financial Market Regulation and Supervision Systems: Challenges and Solutions

Viacheslav M. Shavshukov,Natalia A. Zhuravleva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16060289

2023-05-30

Journal of Risk and Financial Management

Abstract:The purpose of this original study is to critically analyse the emergence and development of the national models of financial regulation, international standards and codes, and regional and national financial regulation and supervision (for the cases of the UK, USA, Sweden, the EU, and Finland). The research raises both academic and regulatory concerns. The relevance and purpose of this research arise from a need for an academic analysis of the economic nature and classification of financial market regulation systems. They represent a theoretical justification for changes in the policies and supervisory practices of national and international regulatory authorities in response to innovations in financial technologies and instruments, digital products, and risks. Secondly, it will stimulate more systematic work on regulatory databases, registration, and reporting procedures in various economies in different financial markets. The author identifies five main systems of national financial regulatory markets: the multi-tiered, multi-agency US system, the twin peaks model (UK), and the mega-regulatory model (Sweden). There is a thorough review of the international standards and institutions that work for the stability of financial systems. The analysis of the regional and national systems of financial regulation and supervision is based on the examples of the EU and Finnish institutions. National macro- and micro-economic regulation and supervision have been examined, with a focus on the US Federal Reserve and the US Treasury. An important result of the study is the systematisation of the directions of the development of national and international regulatory institutions (since the 1980s). First, the minimum capital and credit risk requirements for banks (the 1980s) were complemented in the 21st century by buffer reserves, liquidity, and leverage standards. Second, regulation focuses on ensuring the sustainability of the national economy. The regulatory focus is on ensuring the sustainability of national and global financial systems. Third, there is an increase in the number of supervised institutions. Fourth, there is a division of the functions between central banks (macro-economic regulation) and one or two mega-regulators (micro-economic regulation and supervision). Fifth, there is a division of labour between the international financial institutions (BIS, IMF, and WB) and national regulators. Sixth, the focus is on protecting consumers and investors and countering money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Seventh, there is an understanding based on a common approach by central banks to new financial technologies and cybersecurity.
Pitfalls of Global Harmonization of Systemic Risk Regulation in a World of Financial Innovation

Roberta Romano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3304814

2018-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:The working hypothesis of international financial regulation is that it should be globally harmonized. This paper contends, to the contrary, that we should be wary about the efficacy of global harmonization, and in particular, harmonization of systemic risk measurement and regulation. The thesis is informed by what I consider two key lessons from the recent global financial crisis. The first lesson is that, when business strategies that internationally-harmonized regulation induces banks to follow go seriously awry, the adverse consequences will spread globally and not be limited to one regulator’s domain. The second lesson is that, innovations in financial technology that have been engines of prosperity across the globe also may contain the seeds of financial calamity with imprudent use and regulatory inattention. In addition, three kinds of uncertainty operate in this context: i) uncertainty regarding how best to define and measure systemic risk; (ii), dynamic uncertainty, that financial institutions respond to regulation in unpredictable ways that tend to undermine regulatory effectiveness; and (iii) radical uncertainty, that we do not know all possible future states of the financial system and therefore cannot compute the probabilities of outcomes that would be necessary for informing rules regarding systemic risk measures. The uncertainty in the regulatory context, in conjunction with the lessons from the crisis, suggest that a value-added international regulatory strategy would foster at least a modicum of diversity across national regulatory regimes, along with periodic updating of global standards. At the national level, they suggest adopting a dual-pronged regulatory approach that focuses regulators’ attention on monitoring developments in short-term debt markets, leverage levels, and the impact of new financial products and services, as well as on promoting experimentation, to better inform regulatory decisionmaking.

Financial Regulation after the Global Recession

On the Prudential Regulation of Banks —theories, Institutions and Trends

Financial Regulation: Still Unsettled a Decade After the Crisis

Banking regulation in the United States after the world economic crisis of 2007/2008: economic immunity or false hopes

The Role of Law and Regulation in Sustaining Financial Markets

The UK and Multi-level Financial Regulation

The Political Economy of Bank Regulation in Developing Countries: Risk and Reputation

Financial Crisis, Corporate Governance, and Bank Capital

Market crises, the financial system and the real economy: Analysis and implications for the global financial services industry

What Happened: Financial Factors in the Great Recession

Great Recession and Macroeconomic Theory: A Useless Crisis?

Global Finance of the Post-Crisis Times:Its Supervision and Adjustment

Global Financial Regulation: Shortcomings and Reform Options

THE FINANCIAL CRISIS AND THE SYSTEMIC FAILURE OF THE ECONOMICS PROFESSION

Why Financial Regulation Keeps Falling Short

Network-Sensitive Financial Regulation

Subprime Crisis and Regulatory Responses

Triple Crises and Law Response in the Financial Tsunami

Global Imbalances and the Financial Crisis: Reassessing the Role of International Finance

National and International Financial Market Regulation and Supervision Systems: Challenges and Solutions

Pitfalls of Global Harmonization of Systemic Risk Regulation in a World of Financial Innovation