Abstract:PURPOSE:The study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the evaluation of benign and malignant small renal masses (SRMs) (<4 cm) confirmed by pathology. METHODS:A total of 118 patients with 118 renal masses smaller than 4 cm diagnosed by both CEUS and CECT were enrolled in this study, including 25 benign lesions and 93 malignant lesions. All lesions were confirmed by histopathologic diagnosis after surgical resection. The diagnostic imaging studies of the patients were retrospectively reviewed by two independent ultrasonologists and two independent radiologists blinded to the CT or ultrasound findings and final histological results. All lesions on both CEUS and CECT were independently scored on a 3-point scale (1: benign, 2: equivocal, and 3: malignant). The concordance between interobserver agreement was interpreted using a weighted kappa statistic. The diagnostic efficiency of the evaluation of benign and malignant lesions was compared between CEUS and CECT. RESULTS:All the 118 included lesions were detected by both CEUS and CECT. In CEUS and CECT imaging evaluation of the 118 lesions, the weighted kappa value interpreting the concordance between interobserver agreement was 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.98) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.99), respectively. Both CEUS and CECT demonstrated good diagnostic performance in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SRMs with sensitivity of 93.5% and 89.2%, specificity of 68% and 76%, PPV of 91.6% and 93.3%, NPV of 73.9% and 65.5%, and AUC of 0.808 and 0.826, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the diagnostic performance indices between these two methods (P > 0.05). However, the qualitative diagnosis of small papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by CEUS was significantly better than that by CECT (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in qualitative diagnostic accuracy on other histotypes of SRMs between CEUS and CECT (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Both CEUS and CECT imaging modalities are effective for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant SRMs. Furthermore, CEUS may be more effective than CECT for the qualitative diagnosis of small papillary RCC.

Adnexal masses: Diagnostic performance of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound using the simple rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group

Diagnostic Value of Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound in Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Enhancement Patterns in the Diagnosis of Adrenal Tumors

ROLE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND IN THE PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF CERVICAL LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH PAPILLARY THYROID CARCINOMA

The diagnostic value of contrast enhanced ultrasound in thyroid nodules with an initial inconclusive di-agnostic fine needle aspiration

Application of Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Distinguish Salivary Focal Inflammatory Masses from Malignant Masses: A Retrospective Observational Study

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for the Differential Diagnosis Between Benign and Metastatic Superficial Lymph Nodes: a Meta-Analysis

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Combination of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Strain Elastography to Assess Cytologically Non-Diagnostic Thyroid Nodules.

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Metastatic Adrenal Carcinoma

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) facilitated US in detecting lateral neck lymph node metastasis of thyroid cancer patients: diagnosis value and enhancement patterns of malignant lymph nodes

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US risk stratification and management system for diagnosis of adnexal masses

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the Adnexa Model, Simple Rules Model, and Risk of Malignancy Index for Adnexal Masses in a Gynecological Oncology Centre in China

Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, IOTA Simple Rules and O-RADS for Assessing the Malignant Risk of Sonographically Appearing Solid Ovarian Masses.

Integrating Contrast-enhanced US to O-RADS US for Classification of Adnexal Lesions with Solid Components: Time-intensity Curve Analysis versus Visual Assessment

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound-Based Models for Predicting Malignancy in Patients with Adnexal Masses

Differentiating Benign From Malignant Ovarian Masses With Solid Components: Diagnostic Performance of CEUS Combined With IOTA Simple Rules and O-RADS

A Modified CEUS Risk Stratification Model for Adnexal Masses with Solid Components: Prospective Multicenter Study and Risk Adjustment

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Solid Small Renal Masses: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography for Differential Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses.