THE EFFECTS OF SUN RADIATION ON THE QUALITY OF SACHET AND BOTTLED WATER

Onosakponome .,Ogaga Robert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2021.v06i02.030
2021-06-01
International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology
Abstract:In recent times, packaging of potable water in form of bottled water or sachet water has gradually gained wider acceptability in our major cities. Demographic and socioeconomic variables are largely responsible for the choice and preference for this product. Packaged water exposed to the hot sun in the process of storage or transportation does cause serious chemical exposure. Ultraviolet rays from the sun or high temperatures do accelerate leaching of toxic substance (dioxin) and other plastic chemicals into the water. The polythene bags also develop germs and micro-organisms which enter the water through the deterioration of the polythene bag (weather susceptible). Two bags of sachet water (60cl) and two packs of bottled water (75cl) each were selected for the sample from three purposely selected water packaging companies with regard to the rate of production and consumption. These samples were exposed to direct heat of sunlight to achieve sun radiation, a control was obtained from the same source and assessed after the exposed sample has been tested at intervals of 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 2 months, and finally 3 months duration. The parameter analysis conducted was in adherence to WHO standards and criteria. The results obtained shows that the concentration levels of various physiochemical parameters in the studied packaged water types did not exceed the international guidelines for drinking water but variations of physiochemical properties were found when compared with the control. Such variation can be attributed to the leaching of the compounds produced from the photodegradation of Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) by sunlight. Due to the presence of organic and inorganic compounds in the water sample, residual chlorine, for all samples underwent a depleting process during the course of exposure; Company A recorded a value ranging from 0.02-0.21 mg/l, while Company B’s values ranged from of 0.03-0.2 mg/l and Company C maintained 0.05mg/l to 0.23 mg/l.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?