Abstract:Transforming wildlife management institutions at the cultural level to increase alignment with diverse worldviews can improve relations with Indigenous Peoples and the implementation of Indigenous Knowledges within management. 3 priorities to facilitate this cultural shift are: reconciling historical legacies and power imbalances, moving beyond attempts to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and building reciprocal, accountable relations with Indigenous Peoples. Within governance agencies, academia, and communities alike, there are increasing calls to recognize the value and importance of culture within social‐ecological systems and to better implement Indigenous sciences in research, policy, and management. Efforts thus far have raised questions about the best ethical practices to do so. Engaging with plural worldviews and perspectives on their own terms reflects cultural evolutionary processes driving paradigm shifts in 3 fundamental areas of natural resource management: conceptualizations of natural resources and ecosystems, processes of public participation and governance, and relationships with Indigenous Peoples and communities with differing worldviews. We broadly describe evolution toward these paradigm shifts in fish and wildlife management. We then use 3 case studies to illustrate the ongoing cultural evolution of relationships between wildlife management and Indigenous practices within specific historical and social‐ecological contexts and reflect on common barriers to appropriately engaging with Indigenous paradigms and lifeways. Our case studies highlight 3 priorities that can assist the field of wildlife management in achieving the changes necessary to bridge incommensurable worldviews: acknowledging and reconciling historical legacies and their continued power dynamics as part of social‐ecological systems, establishing governance arrangements that move beyond attempts to extract cultural information from communities to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and engaging in critical reflexivity and reciprocal, accountable relationship building. Implementing these changes will take time and a commitment to processes that may initially feel uncomfortable and unfamiliar but have potential to be transformative. Ethical and culturally appropriate methods to include plural and multivocal perspectives and worldviews on their own terms are needed to transform wildlife management to achieve more effective and just management outcomes for all.

Clashes in conservation: First Nations sites, communities and culture in Australian cultural heritage management

“A Regional Conservation Manifesto”, The Burra Charter and the Australian Re-invention of Urban Heritage Management, ca. 1975–1985

Cultural convergence in heritage landscape conservation: A comparative study of Chinese and English traditions

Revising the Burra Charter: Australia ICOMOS updates its guidelines for conservation practice

Indigenous Heritage Tourism Development in a (Post-)COVID World: Towards Social Justice at Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument, USA

Indigenous Uses of Photographic Digital Heritage in Postcolonizing Australia

Land Use Policy Frameworks in Canada and Aotearoa New Zealand: Examining the Opportunities and Barriers of Indigenous-Led Conservation and Protected Areas

Taking control of the production of heritage: Country and cultural values in the assessment of Aboriginal cultural heritage significance

The Philosophical Dilemma of Conserving the African Heritage: A Case Study of the Treatment of the Kondoa Rock Art World Heritage Site in Tanzania

Decolonising River Restoration: Restoration as Acts of Healing and Expression of Rangatiratanga

Implementing a novel process for solving contentious conservation problems: The genetic status of K'gari wongari (Fraser Island Dingoes) as a case study

Building meaningful collaboration in conservation genetics and genomics

Managing biodiversity on private land: Directions for collaboration through reconciliation ecology

Heritage for all (more inclusive) policies for the management of Cultural Assets

Pang-ngooteekeeya weeng malangeepa ngeeye (remembering our future: bringing old ideas to the new)

Centring Indigenous peoples in knowledge exchange research-practice by resetting assumptions, relationships and institutions

Evolving wildlife management cultures of governance through Indigenous Knowledges and perspectives

Separating natural and cultural heritage: an outdated approach?

Decolonizing the past, empowering the future: Community-led heritage conservation in Ifugao, Philippines

Indigenous-led designation and management of culturally significant species

The Power of Authenticity and Cultural Safety at the Intersection of Healthcare and Child Protection