Abstract:Objective: The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q) measures the nature of the coach-athlete relationship, yet the psychometric properties of the instrument still remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to resolve uncertainty about a suitable factor solution by applying previously used analytical methods, asymptotic distribution-free confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis.Method: The 11-item direct and meta-perspective versions of the CART-Q were examined utilising AMOS, LISREL and Rach analysis using a sample of 251 national football and futsal coaches and athletes. A model comparison strategy with AMOS provided a direct comparison with previous studies. LISREL and Rasch analysis was conducted to provide additional information about the CART-Q psychometric properties.Results: CFA with maximum likelihood and diagonally-weighted least squares estimation methods supported the factorial validity of the three-factor first-order model of both CART-Q versions, although a unidimensional solution was also tenable. Rasch analysis determined that the unidimensional model possessed higher reliability and provided improved coverage of participants' scores, minimising ceiling effects.Conclusion: Research designs that require assessment of coach-athlete relationships may prefer the unidimensional model due to its superior psychometric properties. When more detailed profile scores are required, the subscale scores can still be interpreted with adequate validity and reliabilityKEY POINTSWhat is already known about the topic: The coach-athlete relationship is essential to enhancing performance and psychosocial well-being.The 3+1Cs model and Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q), represents the most popular approach to understanding coach-athlete relationships.Previous studies investigating the CAR factorial validity have identified the 3+1Cs model as a multidimensional structure with universal applicability across cultures.What this study adds: This is the first study to perform CTT and IRT, to minimise the likelihood of psychometric findings materialising as an artefact of using a particular analytic tool.Contrary to previous research, the results of this study suggest that a unidimensional structure obtained greater robustness in increased reliability, item coverage and reduced ceiling effects than the multidimensionality of the model.These results suggest that a unidimensional factor solution is a more appropriate representation of the model than previously reported and provides researchers with confidence in the psychometric properties of the questionnaires.

Theoretical and methodological issues with testing the SCCT and RIASEC models: Comment on Lent, Sheu, and Brown (2010) and Lubinski (2010).

Comparing Holland and Self-Determination Theory Measures of Career Preference as Predictors of Career Choice

Social Cognitive Career Theory at 25: Progress in Studying the Domain Satisfaction and Career Self-Management Models

Five-Factor Personality Traits and RIASEC Interest Types: A Multivariate Meta-Analysis

Creating and Using a Database on Holland’s Theory and Practical Tools

An Examination of the Applicability of Social Cognitive Career Theory for African American College Students

Viewing the Career Indecision Profile within a theoretical context: Application of the social cognitive career self-management model.

Construct validity of questionnaires for the original and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory

How not to evaluate a psychological measure: Rebuttal to criticism of the Defining Issues Test of moral judgment development by Curzer and colleagues

Validity and Reliability Evidence for Assessing Holland's Career Types

Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups.

Assessing Perception of Career Role-Model Performance: The Self-Employed Parent

Resolving uncertainties of the factor structures of the Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q)

Using Interests and Holland’s Model of Vocational Personality Types in Career Counselling: Some Thoughts and Research Findings

Validity study using factor analyses on the Defining Issues Test-2 in undergraduate populations

The role of personality in adolescent career planning and exploration: A social cognitive perspective

How accurate are interest inventories? A quantitative review of career choice hit rates.

Examination of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 10 (CD-RISC-10) using the polytomous Rasch model.

Examining the Conscientiousness × Interest Compensation (CONIC) Model With Similar Constructs in High School and College Students

Broader Issues in Test Translation and Validation: A Commentary Inspired by Macina et al. (2023)

Spherical model of vocational interests – verification of the concept and measurement method