Abstract:As a complement of production-based accounting (PBA), consumption-based accounting (CBA) provides an alternative perspective to understand national emissions and responsibilities for global climate change. Existing studies assessed historical national emissions under CBA. However, how CBA might guide future mitigation under the Paris Agreement goals has not been well understood. By combining global multi-region input-output analysis and the equity principle of 'equal cumulative per capita emissions' (ECPCE), this study explores potential implications of CBA for future national emissions budgets to limit global warming to below 1.5 degrees C. Historically, consumption-based greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were higher than production-based emissions in most developed countries while lower in many developing countries. When CBA is used instead of PBA to allocate emissions budgets by ECPCE, future GHG mitigation burdens would become more stringent in 70% of Annex I (mostly developed) countries but slightly smaller in 55% of non-Annex I (mostly developing) countries. In particular, more than half of Annex I countries might need to achieve negative GHG budgets under 1.5 degrees C. Our analysis emphasizes that, as net emission importers, developed countries could strive to pay equal attention to achieving consumption-based and production-based emissions reductions, and strengthen technological and financial support to developing countries that undertake production outsourcing. As net emission exporters, with international support and domestic investment, developing countries could pragmatically promote energy structure optimization and technological innovation to accelerate the decarbonization of production. To support the Paris Agreement goals, mitigation contributions initiated from the perspective of CBA could also be welcomed. Key policy insights Developed countries shift emissions to developing countries through international trade. CBA increases historical responsibilities of developed countries for climate warming from the PBA assessments. Compared to PBA, CBA has clear implications on future national emissions budgets under responsibility-based allocations, but does not change the urgency of national mitigation required to achieve the Paris Agreement goals. Allocated by ECPCE, future GHG budgets for over 50% of the world's countries would be run out before 2040 under 1.5 degrees C at the 2015 emissions rates, using either CBA or PBA. According to different roles in global supply chains, developed countries should step up support to help developing countries improve emissions and energy intensities, which is a key to reducing emissions embodied in trade.

Comparing developing countries under potential carbon allocation schemes

Scenario Study on Regional Allocation of CO2 Emissions Allowance in China

A Comparison of Carbon Allocation Schemes: on the Equity-Efficiency Tradeoff

Future CO2 Emissions Allowances and Inequality Assessment under Different Allocation Regimes

Allocation of carbon emission quotas based on global equality perspective

Long-Term Climate Change Mitigation Target and Carbon Permit Allocation

Dynamic Equity Carbon Permit Allocation Scheme to Limit Global Warming to Two Degrees

Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways

Regional allocation of carbon dioxide abatement in China

Sharing Emission Space at an Equitable Basis: Allocation Scheme Based on the Equal Cumulative Emission Per Capita Principle

Study on Carbon Dioxide Reduction Schemes of Major Countries and Their Bases

Implications of the Consumption-Based Accounting for Future National Emissions Budgets

Carbon dioxide emission decomposition along the gradient of economic development: The case of energy sustainability in the G7 and Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa

Comparison and analysis of mitigation ambitions of Parties' updated Nationally Determined Contributions

Interprovincial Allocation of China's National Carbon Emission Allowance: an Uncertainty Analysis Based on Monte-Carlo Simulations

How developing countries can engage in GHG reduction: a case study for China

Two-convergece Approach for Future Global Carbon Permit Allocation

Global mitigation efforts cannot neglect emerging emitters

Uncompensated claims to fair emission space risk putting Paris Agreement goals out of reach

Multi-model Comparison of the Economic and Energy Implications for China and India in an International Climate Regime

EXPLORING FAIR AND AMBITIOUS MITIGATION CONTRIBUTIONS OF ASIAN ECONOMIES FOR THE GLOBAL WARMING LIMIT UNDER THE PARIS AGREEMENT