Abstract:Humans interact with animals in numerous ways and on numerous levels. We are indeed living in an “animal”s world,’ in the sense that our lives are very much intertwined with the lives of animals. This also means that animals, like those dogs we commonly refer to as our pets, are living in a “human’s world” in the sense that it is us, not them, who, to a large degree, define and manage the interactions we have with them. In this sense, the human-animal relationship is nothing we should romanticize: it comes with clear power relations and thus with a set of responsibilities on the side of those who exercise this power. This holds, despite the fact that we like to think about our dogs as human’s best friend. Dogs have been part of human societies for longer than any other domestic species. Like no other species they exemplify the role of companion animals. Relationships with pet dogs are both very widespread and very intense, often leading to strong attachments between owners or caregivers and animals and to a treatment of these dogs as family members or even children. But how does this relationship look from the dogs’ perspective? How do they perceive the humans they engage with? What responsibilities and duties arise from the kind of mutual understanding, attachment, and the supposedly “special” bonds we form with them? Are there ethical implications, maybe even ethical implications beyond animal welfare? The past decades have seen an upsurge of research from comparative cognition on pet dogs’ cognitive and social skills, especially in comparison with and reference to humans. We will therefore set our discussion about the nature and ethical dimensions of the human–dog relationship against the background of the current empirical knowledge on dog (social) cognition. This allows us to analyze the human–dog relationship by applying an interdisciplinary approach that starts from the perspective of the dog to ultimately inform the perspective of humans. It is our aim to thereby identify ethical dimensions of the human–dog relationship that have been overlooked so far.

Training Dogs and Training Humans: Symbolic Interaction and Dog Training

Your Dog is Your Teacher: Contemporary Dog Training Beyond Radical Behaviorism

How Dogs Perceive Humans and How Humans Should Treat Their Pet Dogs: Linking Cognition With Ethics

Exploring Levels of Interspecies Interaction: Expectations, Knowledge, and Empathy in Human-Dog Relationships

Intergenerational Transmission of Human Parenting Styles to Human–Dog Relationships

Empowerment theory and prison-based dog training programs

Description of the behaviour of domestic dog (Canis familiaris) by experienced and inexperienced people

Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior by domesticated canines

Humanity’s Best Friend: A Dog-Centric Approach to Addressing Global Challenges

Without words to get in the way: Symbolic interaction in prison-based animal programs

The domestic dog : its evolution, behaviour, and interactions with people

Socio-economic evaluation of human-dog coexistence: A 40,000 years history

Bonded by nature: Humans form equally strong and reciprocated bonds with similar raised dogs and wolves

You talkin' to me? Functional breed selection may have fundamentally influenced dogs' sensitivity to human verbal communicative cues

Cocreating guide dog partnerships: dog training and interdependence in 1930s America

Situated Activities in a Dog Park: Identity and Conflict in Human-Animal Space

Wolves lead and dogs follow, but they both cooperate with humans

On the role of technology in human-dog relationships: a future of nightmares or dreams?

“A DOG CALLED NEVILLE”: USING DOG NAMES TO EXPLORE THEORY AND METHOD IN ANTHROPOLOGY

Human–Animal Relationships and Social Work: Opportunities Beyond the Veterinary Environment

Behavioural synchronisation between different groups of dogs and wolves and their owners/handlers: Exploring the effect of breed and human interaction