Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sustainability performance of modular construction from a life cycle perspective. So far, the sustainability performance of modular buildings has been explored from a life cycle viewpoint. There is no comprehensive study showing which material is the best choice for modular construction considering all three sustainable pillars. Therefore, a life cycle sustainability performance framework, including the three-pillar evaluation framework, was developed for different modular buildings. The materials are concrete, steel and timber constructed as a modular construction method. Design/methodology/approach Transitioning the built environment to a circular economy is vital to achieving sustainability goals. Modular construction is perceived as the future of the construction industry, and in combination with objective sustainability, it is still in the evaluation phase. A life cycle sustainability assessment, which includes life cycle assessment, life cycle cost and social life cycle assessment, has been selected to evaluate alternative materials for constructing a case study building using modular strategies. Subsequently, the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method was used to compute the outranking scores for each modular component. Findings The calculated embodied impacts and global warming potential (GWP) showed that material production is the most critical phase (65%–88% of embodied energy and 64%–86% of GWP). The result of embodied energy and GWP shows timber as an ideal choice. Timber modular has a 21% and 11% lower GWP than concrete and steel, respectively. The timber structure also has 19% and 13% lower embodied energy than concrete and steel. However, the result of the economic analysis revealed that concrete is the most economical choice. The cost calculations indicate that concrete exhibits a lower total cost by 4% compared to timber and 11% higher than steel structures. However, the social assessment suggests that steel emerges as the optimal material when contrasted with timber and concrete. Consequently, determining the best single material for constructing modular buildings becomes challenging. To address this, the MCDM technique is used to identify the optimal choice. Through MCDM analysis, steel demonstrates the best overall performance. Originality/value This research is valuable for construction professionals as it gives a deliberate framework for modular buildings' life cycle sustainability performance and assists with sustainable construction materials.

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Study of Conventional and Prefabricated Construction Methods: MADM Analysis

Integrating three pillars of sustainability for evaluating the modular construction building

A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete and steel-prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction structures in Malaysia

Life cycle sustainability assessment analysis of different concrete construction techniques for residential building in Malaysia

Life Cycle Assessment of Different Prefabricated Rates for Building Construction

Evaluating energy efficiency and environmental sustainability in fiberglass prefabricated modular structures

Quantifying Advantages of Modular Construction: Waste Generation

Comparison of the Embodied Carbon Emissions and Direct Construction Costs for Modular and Conventional Residential Buildings in South Korea

MODULAR CONSTRUCTION: A SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION FOR CARBON EMISSION REDUCTION IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Cost Analysis for Sustainable Off-Site Construction Based on a Multiple-Case Study in China

Identification of Impeding Factors in Utilising Prefabrication during Lifecycle of Construction Projects: An Extensive Literature Review

Life Cycle Environmental and Cost Performance of Prefabricated Buildings

COMPARATIVE CARBON-FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITH DIFFERENT STRUCTURAL MATERIALS

Life Cycle Assessment of a Sustainable Prefabricated Housing System: A Cradle-to-Site Approach Based on a Small-Scale Experimental Model

Comparative analysis of embodied carbon in modular and conventional construction methods in Hong Kong

Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of prefabrication: A comparison of conventional and mixed reality-based solutions

Investigating the impediments to carbon emission mitigation in prefabricated construction: a stakeholder perspective

The analysis of differentiation Between Prefabrication and Modular Construction

Long-Term Comparative Life Cycle Assessment, Cost, and Comfort Analysis of Heavyweight vs. Lightweight Construction Systems in a Mediterranean Climate

Environmental Impacts of Reinforced Concrete Buildings: Comparing Common and Sustainable Materials: A Case Study

The benefits of modern method of construction based on wood in the context of sustainability