Identifying Pitfalls in Lithium Metal Battery Characterization

Eric Winter,Thomas J. Schmidt,Sigita Trabesinger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202100145
2021-10-07
Abstract:Over the past decade, there has been a revival of research activity on lithium metal batteries (LMBs) as these could be a solution for key challenges of electromobility and the energy revolution. While there is growing consensus in the scientific community that common reporting standards and testing conditions for LMBs have to be established, a vast majority of research activities on lithium metal use lab‐dependant testing protocols. For that reason, this publication aims to shed light on various, potentially neglected aspects in battery assembly and testing. Firstly, the long‐term cycling, regarding a range of experimental parameters, such as current density, capacity, electrolyte type and its quantity, as well as contribution of the electrode edges, is shown in both symmetric (Li||Li) and asymmetric (Cu||Li) configurations. The second part focuses on the reversibility of lithium thickness during cycling with and without protected electrode edges, investigated by operando dilatometry. By bringing the insights from this parameter study together, we aim to contribute to better experiment design for future LMB studies, as well as a better understanding for the failure mechanism of Li metal anodes. Pitfalls and standardization need for metallic Li testing: On the road to the high energy density batteries, enabling metallic lithium as anode seems to be the straightest way to success, with many scientists striving to find solutions. Therefore, standardization of testing protocols and result reporting is of paramount importance to achieve common understanding in the community. We present a study of often neglected parameters in both long‐term tests in combination to unexpected finding by operando dilatometry.
materials science, multidisciplinary,electrochemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?