Abstract:Neil Fawkes, Evi Tselenti, Neil Shah, Victoria Lappin, Neil Smith, Arjun Narasimhan, Adam B Smith Reckitt Benckiser Health Care Ltd., Hull, HU8 7DS, UK Correspondence: Neil Fawkes Reckitt Benckiser Health Care Ltd., Dansom Lane, Hull, HU8 7DS, UK Email Background: Skin sensitivity characteristics and triggers have been identified in populations in previous studies. However, few have compared these characteristics among self-reported sensitive skin. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare specific intrinsic and extrinsic triggers of skin sensitivity between individuals with self-reported sensitive skin and non-sensitive skin. Methods: A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with sensitive skin. A 167-item survey was developed on the basis of the literature review. The survey was completed online by a sample of adult participants drawn from the general United Kingdom population. Participants also completed sociodemographic and self-reported health questions. Results: A total of 3050 surveys were completed: 1526 participants with self-reported skin sensitivity and 1524 participants not reporting skin sensitivity. There was a decrease in self-reported skin sensitivity with increasing age (p< 0.05), and proportionally more women reported sensitive skin. Smoking also led to a higher frequency of sensitive skin. All signs and symptoms of sensitive skin, such as itch, dryness/flakiness, roughness and flushing/blushing were more commonly reported by those with self-reported sensitive skin. These were frequently reported in association with external factors (cold/windy weather, clothes and fabrics), as well as internal factors such as pre-existing skin conditions and atopy. Conclusion: The study evaluated self-reported sensitive skin against a non-sensitive skin in order to identify common inherent and external triggers to distinguish between these groups in a large general population study in the United Kingdom. The key symptoms and signs of this syndrome identified in the literature were confirmed to be reported significantly more when compared with those without sensitive skin. However, no correlation or pattern of symptomology could be identified, reinforcing the complexity of this condition. Given the strong differentiation from the non-sensitive group, the results of this research could be utilised for the development of a clinically meaningful screening tool. Keywords: sensitive skin, smoking, age, asthma, atopy Sensitive skin is a common condition that affects an estimated 50% of the individuals 1 with global reported prevalence rates ranging from 12.79% to 68.4%. 2–4 Several international surveys have shown an increase in self-reported sensitive skin prevalence over the last 5 years, particularly in men. 5–8 This suggests potential changes in population skin characteristics and attitudes to self-reported skin sensitivity. Despite the high prevalence of skin sensitivity, there is a lack of clear consensus regarding its definition and diagnosis of people with sensitive skin. A recent expert consensus of sensitive skin suggests that it is a complex problem characterised by unpleasant sensations (stinging, burning, pain, pruritus, and tingling sensations) in response to stimuli that normally should not provoke such sensations. These unpleasant sensations cannot be explained by lesions attributable to any skin disease. The skin colour can appear normal or be accompanied by erythema. Sensitive skin can affect all body locations, especially the face. 9 The development of cosmetic products routinely includes pre-market product testing intended to ensure that any marketed product is free of irritant potential and often if they are suitable for people with sensitive skin. Nonetheless, it is not uncommon for companies to receive post-marketing complaints of unpleasant reactions to such products. 10 This is also reflected in existing epidemiology studies, for instance, where 78% of the consumers that declared "very sensitive skin" avoided specific products due to prior experiences of unpleasant effects with their use. 11 The reliable diagnosis of sensitive skin remains problematic. A variety of methods have been used to identify individuals with sensitive skin, most of which have significant limitations. 12 For instance, tests have focused on eliciting specific objective sensory reactions, such as stinging or burning, or provoking irritation with enhanced means of detecting inflammatory responses, which are often unpleasant for participants. That said, there are tools available to determine the severity of sensitive skin, such as the Sensitive Scale – 10 -Abstract Truncated-

Proposal of a self‐assessment questionnaire for the diagnosis of sensitive skin

Proposal for Cut-off Scores for Sensitive Skin on Sensitive Scale-10 in a Group of Adult Women

Development and validation of a prospective questionnaire for assessing oily sensitive skin

A Survey to Identify Determinants That Influence Self-Perceived Sensitive Skin in a British Population: Clues to Developing a Reliable Screening Tool for Sensitive Skin

Reflectance confocal microscopy for the evaluation of sensitive skin.

Burden of Sensitive Skin (BoSS) Questionnaire and Current Perception Threshold: Use as Diagnostic Tools for Sensitive Skin Syndrome

Comparison of a New Sensitive Skin Questionnaire and Baumann's Sensitive Skin Questionnaire in Chengdu, China

Pilot Testing and Validation of an Atopic Dermatitis Screening and Evaluation Questionnaire

Sensitive skin: Active ingredients on the spotlight

Rosacea and seborrheic dermatitis differentially respond to lactic acid sting and capsaicin tests in Chinese women

From consistent subjective assessment of skin sensitivity severity to its accurate objective scoring

Evaluation of the severity and triggering factors of sensitive scalp in Chinese females

A Highly Efficient and User‐Friendly Sensitive Skin Model on the Forearm

Triggering factors in sensitive skin from the worldwide patients’ point of view: a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis

Quantitative evaluation of sensitive skin by ANTERA 3D® combined with GPSkin Barrier®

FS07.5 Sensitive skin: What is it? What strategies meet its challenge?

Cowhage-induced Itch Scores and the Current Perception Threshold in Assessing Sensitive Skin: an Observational Laboratory Study

The Prevalence of Sensitive Skin

Testing for irritation with a multifactorial approach: comparison of eight non-invasive measuring techniques on five different irritation types

Pathophysiology and management of sensitive skin: position paper from the special interest group on sensitive skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch (IFSI)

Effective treatment for sensitive skin: 4-t-butylcyclohexanol and licochalcone A