Abstract:Anxious about the failure of decisionmakers to significantly reduce ‘the human impact’ on Earth, many global change researchers are looking for ways and means to influence public policy, business strategy and civil society more strongly. As part of this, there is a greater emphasis on understanding and altering the ‘human dimensions’ of global environmental change. A number of physical and society‐environment geographers are involved in this endeavour, building on some valuable past achievements. But what lies ahead? I address this question by examining the rich idea of a ‘social contract’ – one little used in disciplinary debates about Geography's past, present and future, but now relatively common in certain wider discussions of anthropogenic global change. I suggest that there are currents of thinking in contemporary Geography that can offer something both new and much needed in the world of global change research. That ‘something’ is not ever more integrated, accurate analysis of dynamic, coupled human–environment interactions – as if we live in just one world requiring ever more ‘joined‐up’ and granular description, explanation and prediction. Instead, it is an approach to research that eschews ontological holism, epistemological monism and the fact–value dualism. This approach suggests that taking the human dimensions of environmental change seriously requires a new kind of global change research that is at once overtly political and intellectually plural. Far from being a charter for ‘bias’ or ‘relativism’, I show that this approach expresses the rich senses of responsibility, accountability and representation contained in the version of a new social contract I advocate here. A wider implication of my argument is that Geography needs new stories about the nature and merits of ‘intra‐disciplinarity’, ones better attuned to the role of research in fostering democracy in our ‘post‐normal’ times. Thinking afresh about how research should influence society promises to alter many geographers’ sense of self while usefully repurposing global change research across several disciplines.

A Copernican Moment: Engaging Economic Ethics in Orchestrating the Geocentric Turn in Economics

Geography and the new social contract for global change research

Beyond Green Capitalism: Social–Ecological Transformation and Perspectives of a Global Green-Left

The what, who and how of socio-ecological justice: Tailoring a new justice model for earth system law

Earth system law for the Anthropocene: rethinking environmental law alongside the Earth system metaphor

Escaping the Loop of Unsustainability: Why and How Business Ethics Matters for Earth System Justice

Anthropology and the Anthropocene: Criticisms, Experiments, and Collaborations

Human Rights and New Horizons? Thoughts toward a New Juridical Ontology

Reflections on the political economy of planetary health

The Foundational Economy as a Cornerstone for a Social–Ecological Transformation

From Linear to Circular Economy: a Transaction Cost Approach to the Ecological Transformation of the Firm

A pragmatist ecological economics - Normative foundations and a framework for actionable knowledge

Earth stewardship: Shaping a sustainable future through interacting policy and norm shifts

Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene: Unraveling the Money-Energy-Technology Complex

Earth system modeling with endogenous and dynamic human societies: the copan:CORE open World-Earth modeling framework

Clash of the eco-sciences: carbon marketization, environmental NGOs and performativity as politics

A new normative economics for the formation of shared social values

Imagining beyond nature-culture dualism: An exploration of ecological justice

Celebrating the End of Enlightenment: Organization Theory in the Age of the Anthropocene and Gaia (and why neither is the solution to our ecological crisis)

The Increasing Importance of Geoeconomics in Power Rivalries in the Twenty-First Century

Comparative capitalisms in the Anthropocene: a research agenda for green transition