Diagnostic performance and clinical utility of referral rules to identify primary care patients at risk of an inflammatory rheumatic disease

Elke Theodora Antonia Maria Delft,Deirisa Lopes Barreto,Annette Helena Maria Helm‐van Mil,Celina Alves,Johanna Maria Wilhelmina Hazes,Tjallingius Martijn Kuijper,Angelique Elisabeth Adriana Maria Weel‐Koenders,Elke Theodora Antonia Maria van Delft,Annette Helena Maria van der Helm‐van Mil
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24789
2021-09-22
Abstract:ObjectiveTo determine the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of the Rotterdam Early Arthritis CoHort (REACH) and the Clinical Arthritis RulE (CARE) referral rules in an independent population of unselected patients from primary care. MethodsThis study consisted of adults who were suspected of the need for referral towards a rheumatologist by their general practitioner. Diagnostic accuracy measures and a net benefit approach were used to compare both rules to usual care for recognizing inflammatory arthritis (IA) and inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD). Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method and cross-validation we created an optimal prediction rule for IRD. ResultsThis study consisted of 250 patients, of whom 42 (17%) were diagnosed with IA and 55 (22%) with an IRD three months after referral. Considering IA, the AUC was 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.80) for the REACH and 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.88) for the CARE. Considering IRD, the AUC was 0.66 (95% CI 0.58-0.74) for the REACH and 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.83) for the CARE. The CARE was of highest clinical value when compared to usual care. The composite referral rule for IRD of ten parameters included: sex, age, joint features, acute onset of complaints, physical limitations, and duration of complaints (AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.88). ConclusionBoth validated rules have a net benefit in recognizing IA as well as IRD compared to usual care, however the CARE rule shows superiority over the REACH rule. Although the composite referral rule indicates a greater diagnostic performance, external validation is needed.
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?