Abstract:Background Dental implants made of zirconia (ZrO2) are a potential alternative for titanium implants in dentistry because of their good biocompatibility, mechanical properties and excellent aesthetic results. However, solid long‐term scientific data to prove clinical success of ZrO2 implants are scarce. Aim The aim of this study was to describe and to examine the clinical performance of custom‐made two‐piece ZrO2 implants, to identify possible influencing factors: a) manipulation of the implant after placement and b) the occlusal scheme on the survival rate, and to evaluate the performance of the implant‐supported crown. This follow‐up study collected and examined the 5‐year data to answer the main question: What are the survival and the success rates of custom‐made ZrO2 implants in the maxillary premolar region after 5 years? Material and Methods Of the 31 included patients in this prospective 5‐year follow‐up single‐arm clinical trial, 30 received a custom‐made ZrO2 implant to replace a missing single maxillary premolar, which was subsequently restored with a lithium disilicate crown. Parameters regarding clinical performance, marginal bone‐level (MBL) changes, and patient‐related outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed preoperatively, at the baseline, as well as 1 and 5 years after crown placement. Chances of survival and success of the implant were calculated and displayed using Kaplan–Meier statistics. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also performed with stratification based on the variables "manipulation of the implant prior to impression taking" and "occlusal scheme" and compared using log‐rank tests. Bone‐level moderation in time was compared using a paired samples t‐test. Patient's expectations and satisfaction after 5 years were compared as a measure of fulfilled expectations, using a Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. Performance of the implant‐supported crowns was evaluated using validated criteria. Results Survival and success probabilities after 5 years were, respectively, 75.8% (95% CI [60.0%; 91.0%]) and 71.0% (95% CI [54.0%; 88.0%]) for the custom‐made ZV3 implants. No significant differences in survival rate were found after stratification on "manipulation of the implant" and on "occlusal scheme." Mean bone‐level alteration between baseline and the first follow‐up was +0.06 mm (95% CI [−0.23 mm; 0.12 mm]; SD = 0.42 mm) and between baseline and the second follow‐up was +0.04 mm (95% CI [−0.35 mm; 0.26 mm]; SD = 0.54 mm). Patients' satisfaction for patients with implants still in function after 5 years was 91.7% (IQR = [90.5%–97.3%]), indicating satisfaction with the treatment. Pooled satisfaction in patients with successful implants after 5 years was significantly higher than patients' expressed expectations before treatment. None of the crowns failed, and no interventions were required. Conclusion and Clinical Implications Survival rate of these particular ZV3 implants in our study was lower than expected and clinically not acceptable. Hence, ZV3 implant placement as applied in this study cannot be recommended for clinical practice. Further research on the different appearances of mechanical failure in ZrO2 implants would be highly recommended before a larger prospective randomized clinical trial is conducted to evaluate treatment with custom‐made ZrO2 dental implants.

Zirconia implants: a promising alternative to titanium?

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of zirconia dental implants—A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Prospective Clinical Multicenter Study Evaluating the 5-Year Performance of Zirconia Implants in Single-Tooth Gaps

Prospective controlled clinical study investigating long‐term clinical parameters, patient satisfaction, and microbial contamination of zirconia implants

Ceramic implants (Y-TZP): are they a viable alternative to titanium implants for the support of overdentures? A randomized clinical trial

Long-term survival and success of zirconia screw-retained implant-supported prostheses for up to 12 years: A retrospective multicenter study

Zirconia dental implants: where are we now, and where are we heading?

Metal‐Free Custom‐Made Zirconia Implants—A Prospective 5‐Year Follow‐Up Single‐Arm Clinical Trial

Is zirconia a viable alternative to titanium for oral implant? A critical review

Two-piece zirconia implants in the posterior mandible and maxilla: A cohort study with a follow-up period of 9 years

Zirconia versus Titanium Implants: 8-Year Follow-Up in a Patient Cohort Contrasted with Histological Evidence from a Preclinical Animal Model

Clinical performance of monolithic zirconia crowns on titanium-zirconium reduced-diameter implants in the molar area: Interim data at three years of a randomized controlled trial

A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants

Investigating the Long-Term Success and Complication Rates of Zirconia Dental Implants: A Prospective Clinical Study

Five-year outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing single-tooth implant-supported restoration with either zirconia or titanium abutments

A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth edentulous area: 3-year follow-up

A randomized clinical trial on zirconia versus titanium implants in maxillary single tooth replacement

Peri-implant Crestal Bone Changes Around Zirconia Implants in Periodontally Healthy and Compromised Patients.

Clinical evaluation and patient related outcomes of one- and two-piece zirconia implants at five years of loading: A case series study