Abstract:Background: Progress in characterising the humoral immune response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been rapid but areas of uncertainty persist. Assessment of the full range of evidence generated to date to understand the characteristics of the antibody response, its dynamics over time, its determinants and the immunity it confers will have a range of clinical and policy implications for this novel pathogen. This review comprehensively evaluated evidence describing the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 published from 01/01/2020-26/06/2020. Methods: Systematic review. Keyword-structured searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase and COVID-19 Primer. Articles were independently screened on title, abstract and full text by two researchers, with arbitration of disagreements. Data were double-extracted into a pre-designed template, and studies critically appraised using a modified version of the Public Health Ontario Meta-tool for Quality Appraisal of Public Health Evidence (MetaQAT) tool, with resolution of disagreements by consensus. Findings were narratively synthesised. Results: 150 papers were included. Most studies (113 or 75%) were observational in design, were based wholly or primarily on data from hospitalised patients (108, 72%) and had important methodological limitations. Few considered mild or asymptomatic infection. Antibody dynamics were well described in the acute phase, up to around three months from disease onset, but the picture regarding correlates of the antibody response was inconsistent. IgM was consistently detected before IgG in included studies, peaking at weeks two to five and declining over a further three to five weeks post-symptom onset depending on the patient group; IgG peaked around weeks three to seven post-symptom onset then plateaued, generally persisting for at least eight weeks. Neutralising antibodies were detectable within seven to 15 days following disease onset, with levels increasing until days 14-22 before levelling and then decreasing, but titres were lower in those with asymptomatic or clinically mild disease. Specific and potent neutralising antibodies have been isolated from convalescent plasma. Cross-reactivity but limited cross-neutralisation with other human coronaviridae was reported. Evidence for protective immunity in vivo was limited to small, short-term animal studies, showing promising initial results in the immediate recovery phase. Conclusions: Literature on antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 is of variable quality with considerable heterogeneity of methods, study participants, outcomes measured and assays used. Although acute phase antibody dynamics are well described, longer-term patterns are much less well evidenced. Comprehensive assessment of the role of demographic characteristics and disease severity on antibody responses is needed. Initial findings of low neutralising antibody titres and possible waning of titres over time may have implications for sero-surveillance and disease control policy, although further evidence is needed. The detection of potent neutralising antibodies in convalescent plasma is important in the context of development of therapeutics and vaccines. Due to limitations with the existing evidence base, large, cross-national cohort studies using appropriate statistical analysis and standardised serological assays and clinical classifications should be prioritised.

SARS-CoV-2 mucosal antibody development and persistence and their relation to viral load and COVID-19 symptoms

Systemic and mucosal antibody responses specific to SARS-CoV-2 during mild versus severe COVID-19

Distinct systemic and mucosal immune responses during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection

Mucosal and systemic immune correlates of viral control after SARS-CoV-2 infection challenge in seronegative adults

Systemic SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses to infection and to COVID-19 and BCG vaccination

Early, robust mucosal secretory IgA but not IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 spike in oral fluid is associated with faster viral clearance and COVID-19 symptom resolution

Early, robust mucosal secretory IgA but not IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 spike in oral fluid is associated with faster viral clearance and COVID-19 symptom resolution.

Longitudinal observation and decline of neutralizing antibody responses in the three months following SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans

SARS-CoV-2-specific nasal IgA wanes 9 months after hospitalisation with COVID-19 and is not induced by subsequent vaccination

Determinants of Systemic SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibody Responses to Infection and to Vaccination: A Secondary Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trial Data

Comparison of levels of nasal, salivary, and plasma antibody to SARS-CoV-2 during natural infection and after vaccination

Subclinical SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Endemic Human Coronavirus Immunity Shape SARS-CoV-2 Saliva Antibody Responses

Durable T-cellular and humoral responses in SARS-CoV-2 hospitalized and community patients

Patient and immunological factors associated with delayed clearance of mucosal SARS-CoV-2 RNA and symptom persistence

Evolution of antibody immunity to SARS-CoV-2

Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review

The Mucosal and Serological Immune Responses to the Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccines

Mucosal antibody response and SARS‐CoV‐2 shedding in patients with COVID‐19 related olfactory dysfunction

SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies: Longevity, breadth, and evasion by emerging viral variants

Dynamics and significance of the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection

A stronger antibody response in increased disease severity of SARS-CoV-2