Abstract:The international tax framework relies on early-twentieth-centuryprinciples and favors the interests of the Global North,which created it. It bases taxing rights on a corporation’s physicalpresence and mostly allocates profits to the country of residence.Moreover, it has been slow to adapt to modern business practices.In the digital economy, companies shift profits with relative easeand often do not require a physical presence in the location of theirconsumers. International taxation needs reform, but leadingproposals do not reflect meaningful input from the Global South andare unlikely to serve the needs of developing countries.In 2021, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment (OECD), known informally as the “World TaxOrganization,” introduced new rules for the cross-border taxation ofmultinational enterprises. The new rules intend to address the taxchallenges of digitalization and profit-shifting, and they are likelythe most significant change to international taxation in severaldecades. However, the OECD does not represent the interests of developing economies, and the proposed reform has not remediedthe historic imbalance which disfavors the Global South.This Article highlights the shortcomings of the OECD’smultilateral efforts in the context of taxation and digitalization. Itanalyzes the political lawmaking of the OECD and presents the newrules as a compromise that fails to address inequities in cross-bordertaxation. The Article argues that the reform undermines taxsovereignty and that the current international tax regime overlooksthe involvement of the world’s developing countries. It asserts thatattempts to promote inclusivity within the OECD have largely beenexpressive and that the international tax framework inherentlydisadvantages developing countries and their interests. The Articleproposes steps to promote the equal-footed participation ofdeveloping countries in future international tax policy initiatives.First, it recommends expanding voting rights for non-memberswithin the OECD. Second, it supports the creation of a newintergovernmental framework within the United Nations that isbetter positioned to revisit traditional international tax normsthrough a genuinely inclusive process.

International Tax Law- Status Quo, Trends and Perspectives

Public international law, international taxation and tax dispute resolution

Reflections on the Fight against Aggressive Tax Planning (When the Law Is Silent)

New Developments in Dispute Resolution in International Tax

An Unfinished Patchwork: An Assessment of the Current International Tax Dispute Resolution System from a Developing Country Perspective

The expanding universe of international tax disputes: a principled analysis of the OECD international tax dispute settlement proposals

International Corporate Income Tax Reform: Issues and Proposals

Improving the Resolution of International Tax Disputes

System of sources and principles of international tax law

The OECD Dispute Resolution System in Tax Controversies

The BRICs and International Tax Governance: The Case of Automatic Exchange of Information

Tax havens reexamined: The impact of global digital tax reforms on international taxation

Beyond BEPS: A Tax Policy Agenda for Developing Countries

International Tax Reform: Challenges to Multilateral Cooperation

BEPS Project and International Tax Reform: The 2021 Agreements on Taxing Multinational Companies

The Impact of European Union Law on the Possibilities of European Union Member States to Adapt International Tax Rules to the Business Models of Multinational Enterprises

Consolidated financial statements and global tax policy (OECD BEPS) insights from a multijurisdictional case study

Tax Cooperation Without a Duty of Assistance

Recent Developments in Federal Income Taxation: The Year 2002

Direct Versus Indirect Taxation: Trends, Theory, and Economic Significance

The Parallel Rise of Multinational Enterprises and the Historical Development of International Tax Rules – Introspection for the New Rules to Tax the Digital Economy