Abstract:Context A fundamental assumption behind a high stakes accountability system is that standardized testing, proficiency goal setting for demographic student subgroups, and sanctions would motivate teachers to focus on students whose performance had heretofore lagged. Students with disabilities became one such subgroup under the No Child Left Behind system. Special education teachers faced a novel pressure: to radically narrow the achievement gap between their students with disabilities towards proficiency or incur sanctions and corrective action for their schools and districts. Purpose The study uses the concept of “integrity” to analyze public service workers’ agency in situations of strain or crisis. Integrity consists of four overlapping domains of judgment: obligations of office, personal integrity, client needs, and prudence. Research Design The study is an in-depth multiple case study of seven teachers; 21 structured interviews, and 17 observations, augmented by a number of informal contact that included invitations to observe teacher meetings and conversations with school administrators. Findings The study found that the special education teachers faced a true dilemma. Teachers adopted contradictory solutions — some embraced the new demands, some rejected them. Both seemed equally untenable. The study reveals salient dimensions of this dilemma: how teachers related to the external moral obligation to equalize, what they chose to ‘see’ when they viewed the achievement gap; how they explained, or explained away, their agency in narrowing the gap; how they strategized and muddled through with instructional maneuvers to make the gap go away; and what they regarded, and guarded, as fields of professional responsibility and autonomous decision making. Implications What kind of accountability system would enable a collective dialogue among special education teachers in which high expectations, keen diagnosis, instructional expertise, internal responsibility for individualized learning gains, openness to external challenge, and attention to results would be the poles of the discussion? At the core, such an accountability system would validate the professionalism of the most expert teachers and avoid activating their defensiveness and demoralization. It would guard against middling expectations by making the performance of a wide spectrum of high and low performing schools or special education departments transparent. It would stay away from high pressure attached to unrealistic goals in order to discourage teachers from developing blind spots about their students, or acting with mere compliance and expediency. It would motivate a dynamic of student-centered continuous improvement in reference to a common standard, but also to low-stakes metrics that may guide iterative improvement.

Assembling the ‘Accomplished’ Teacher: The performativity and politics of professional teaching standards

Power, prestige and pedagogic identity: a tale of two programs recontextualizing teacher standards

The ‘good’ teacher in an era of professional standards: policy frameworks and lived realities

Redefining what it means to be a teacher through professional standards: implications for continuing teacher education

The Language of Standards and Teacher Education Reform

Professional standards in teacher education: tracing discourses of professionalism through the analysis of textbooks

Perform or else: the performative enhancement of teacher professionalism

Political rationales and ideological stances of the standards-based reform of teacher education in the US

The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity

Addressing Physical Education Teacher Socialization Through Standards-based Reform of Physical Education Teacher Education

Beyond the DAP versus standards dilemma: Examining the unforgiving complexity of kindergarten teaching in the United States

When the Achievement Gap Becomes High Stakes for Special Education Teachers: Facing a Dilemma with Integrity

‘The village and the world’: competing agendas in teacher research – professional autonomy, interpretational work and strategic compliance

In search of the excellent literature teacher. An inductive approach to constructing professional teaching standards

Professionalism in the era of accountability: Role discrepancy and responses among teachers in the Netherlands

Teacher professional identity: competing discourses, competing outcomes

Gender Politics and Conceptions of the Modern Teacher: Women, Identity and Professionalism.

Too emotional to be capable? The changing nature of emotion work in definitions of ‘capable teaching’

A social realist challenge to the structuring of professional practice knowledge for initial teacher education in England

Reimagining Responsible Research Innovations Regarding Professional Teaching Standards for Curriculum Practice

How can evaluation contribute to policy reform? Lessons from the evaluation of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers