The impact of preoperative percutaneous nephrostomy as a treatment strategy before flexible ureteroscopy for impacted upper ureteral stones with hydronephrosis

Go Anan,Daisuke Kudo,Toshimitsu Matsuoka,Yasuhiro Kaiho,Makoto Sato
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-547
2021-10-01
Translational Andrology and Urology
Abstract:BACKGROUND: The treatment of impacted upper ureteral stones with hydronephrosis remains a challenge for urologists. The current study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative percutaneous nephrostomy (PNS) as a treatment strategy before flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) of asymptomatic impacted upper ureteral stones with hydronephrosis.METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included patients who underwent PNS (group A, n=61) and those who did not (group B, n=75) before f-URS for asymptomatic impacted upper ureteral stones with hydronephrosis. Impacted ureteral stones are defined as those that remain in one position for &gt;2 months. Operative outcomes, including stone-free rate, operation time, postoperative hospital days, and complication rate, were evaluated.RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, and stone size between the two groups except in the grade of hydronephrosis, with group A having more cases of advanced hydronephrosis than group B. The stone-free rate was significantly higher in group A than in group B [95% <i>vs.</i> 77% (P=0.004)]. However, there were no significant differences between the groups in operation time [55 <i>vs</i>. 55 min (P=0.84)], postoperative fever [5% <i>vs</i>. 5% (P=1.00)], and postoperative hospital days [2 <i>vs</i>. 2 days (P=0.44)]. In group A, preoperative PNS placement was performed 4 days before f-URS, and the PNS was removed postoperatively on the same day of the f-URS. Additionally, subgroup analysis was performed in cases of grade 2 and 3 hydronephrosis. A total of 110 patients, 60 who underwent f-URS with PNS and 50 who underwent f-URS without PNS, were included. The stone-free rate was significantly higher in f-URS with PNS than in f-URS without PNS [95% <i>vs.</i> 76% (P=0.005)]. However, no significant differences were found between the groups in operation time, ureteral injury, postoperative fever, and postoperative hospital days.CONCLUSIONS: At grade 2 or 3 hydronephrosis, preoperative PNS as a treatment strategy for a few days prior to f-URS for impacted upper ureteral stones improved the stone-free rate without increasing the operation time and postoperative length of hospital stay.
urology & nephrology,andrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?