Abstract:Problem setting. Problems of international relations and foreign policy have always been in the center of public attention of analysts, politicians and journalists. Although secret diplomacy is a highly controversial phenomenon in terms of public morality, it is an effective means of pursuing defense policy, military cooperation and establishing international relations for peace. In practice, secret diplomacy has various forms of implementation, such as holding “closed” conferences, signing secret multilateral agreements, providing covert instructions, and others. Any form of implementation must take into account the fact that the ultimate goal is to achieve the maximum national interest with a minimum of controversy and resentment from others. Analysis of recent researches and publications. Among Ukrainian scholars, D. Kostyuk and D. Kurillo, S. Pik and others. Anthony John Wanis-ST., a professor of the American University’s School of International Service in Washington, D.C., made a significant contribution to the study of secret diplomacy. John, Cornelius Biola, a professor at Oxford University, and Aaron Klieman, a professor at Tel Aviv University. Target of research is to define the concept of secret diplomacy, analyze the main ways of its implementation, as well as explore the features of their functioning in international relations. Article’s main body. The research is devoted to the definition of “secret diplomacy” and analysis of the main ways of its implementation. Peculiarities of the functioning of forms of secret diplomacy in international relations have been studied. Forms of secret diplomacy include “closed” conferences, secret bilateral and tripartite agreements, the provision of secret instructions by states to diplomats, correspondence through closed channels, and non-public diplomacy. The definition of “secret diplomacy” is proposed. Examples of the application of secret diplomacy in practice have been studied. “Secret” conferences are a very effective way to reach agreement on some common issues, they are difficult because of both the organization and the stage: the more participants in the negotiations, the more difficult it is to maintain secrecy and control information leaks. Details of such negotiations are often leaked to the media, causing serious harm to participants. The signing of secret bilateral and tripartite agreements allows countries to significantly expand the range of issues under discussion, including all issues, from cooperation in various sectors of the economy, military cooperation to joint action in the international arena. The practice of giving secret instructions to diplomats is often used: when sending a diplomatic mission, the state provides its members with a number of mandatory secret instructions, as well as coordinates its work during negotiations. Closed channel correspondence, the biggest advantage of which is the small number of people who take part in it, which in turn allows the sender and recipient to keep all correspondence secret, preventing the essence of correspondence from being revealed to third parties. Non-public diplomacy consists of negotiations officially authorized by the leadership of states, which take place between the parties to the conflict in secret from other parties. Conclusions and prospects for the development. Despite the disadvantages, covert diplomacy can create an enabling environment for constructive negotiations by isolating foreign policy figures from public speaking, giving them the highest level of security, informality, autonomy and the ability to “save face” in public. It is not a universal way to solve all problems, but, in our opinion, it is an effective method of resolving protracted conflicts that negatively affect world politics.

State activity of the Ukrainian People's Republic Central Council: a comparative analysis against the background of diplomacy in Central-Eastern Europe

Diplomacy of Ukrainian statehood from the establishment to the present (the late 1910s - 2020s): Major international partners, dynamics, and specific features

Historical and legal aspect of the formation of the external function of Ukraine: from state formations to the cossatians

CULTURAL DIPLOMACY OF UKRAINE: EXPERIENCE, PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

Russian-Ukrainian Relations in the Historical Context of the Formation of Sovereign Ukrainian Statehood

Current State of Ukrainian-Indian Relations

The Political and Diplomatic Position of the Central Asian Countries Regarding Russia’s Special Military Operation in Ukraine

Comparative-legal analysis of the structure of external functions of Ukraine and Hungary: implementation of experience (part 2)

Features of the current geopolitical situation and foreign policy of independent Ukraine

Prospects for intensifying the promotion of Ukrainian goods and services on foreign markets by trade diplomacy

Reforming European Union Conflict Policy in the Context of the Crisis in Ukraine

aspects of international communication

State regulation of cross-border cooperation at the regional level

MULTILATERAL DIPLOMACY AS AN TOOL OF REGIONAL TRADE AND ECONOMIC COOPERATION BETWEEN UKRAINE AND CHINA

National interests as the basis for “revisionism” on the international arena in the context of National Security Strategies of Ukraine, United States, and Russia

Ukraine Ukraine’s Public Diplomacy in the Middle East in War Conditions (in the example of Lebanon)

Priorities of the Ukraine’s public diplomacy in the early 2020s

STRATEGIC DOMINANTS OF THE ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ASYMMETRIC GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT

Definition of the concept of «secret diplomacy» and methods of its implementation in international relations

The US Foreign Policy towards Eastern Europe: State of the Field

Historical preconditions of democratic changes in the context of the formation and development of Ukrainian statehood