Abstract:To inform mitigation strategies and understand how microplastics affect wildlife, research is focused on understanding the sources, pathways and occurrence of microplastics in the environment and in wildlife. This entails counting and characterizing microplastics in nature, which is a labor‐intensive process, particularly given the range of particle sizes and morphologies present within this diverse class of contaminants. Thus, it is crucial to determine appropriate sampling methods that best capture the types and quantities of microplastics relevant to inform the questions and objectives at hand. It is also critical to follow protocols with strict quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) measures so that results reflect accurate estimates of microplastic contamination. Here, we assess different sampling procedures and QA/QC strategies to inform best practices for future environmental monitoring and assessments of exposure. We compare microplastic abundance and characteristics in surface water samples collected using different methods (i.e., manta and bulk water) at the same sites, as well as duplicate samples for each method taken at the same site and approximate time. Samples were collected from nine sampling sites within San Francisco Bay using three different sampling methods: 1) manta trawl (manta); 2) 1 L grab (grab); and 3) 10 L bulk water filtered in situ (pump). Bulk water sampling methods (both grab and pump) captured more microplastics within the smaller size range (<335 µm), most of which were fibers. Manta samples captured a greater diversity of morphologies, but underestimated smaller‐sized particles. Inspection of pump samples revealed high numbers of particles from procedural contamination, stressing the need for robust QA/QC, including sampling and analyzing laboratory blanks, field blanks, and duplicates. Choosing the appropriate sampling method, combined with rigorous, standardized QA/QC practices, is essential for the future of microplastics research in marine and freshwater ecosystems.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A microplastic size classification scheme aligned with universal plankton survey methods

Microplastics in the Marine Environment: Sources, Fates, Impacts and Microbial Degradation

Evidence of Microplastic Size Impact on Mobility and Transport in the Marine Environment: A Review and Synthesis of Recent Research

A new method for analyzing microplastic particle size distribution in marine environmental samples

Microplastics in riverine systems: Recommendations for standardized sampling, separation, digestion and characterization

Critical reassessment of microplastic abundances in the marine environment

Microplastics and plankton: Knowledge from laboratory and field studies to distinguish contamination from pollution

Zooplankton as a suitable tool for microplastic research

Is It or Isn't It: The Importance of Visual Classification in Microplastic Characterization

Quantification of plankton-sized microplastics in a productive coastal Arctic marine ecosystem

Cellular effects of microplastics are influenced by their dimension: Mechanistic relationships and integrated criteria for particles definition.

Methods Matter: Methods for Sampling Microplastic and Other Anthropogenic Particles and Their Implications for Monitoring and Ecological Risk Assessment

Modeling Microplastic Transport in the Marine Environment: Testing Empirical Models of Particle Terminal Sinking Velocity for Irregularly Shaped Particles

Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review

Elucidating the vertical transport of microplastics in the water column: A review of sampling methodologies and distributions

Comparison of two pump-based systems for sampling small microplastics (>10 μM) in coastal waters

A Global Perspective on Microplastics

Microplastics in the environment: analytical chemistry methods, sorption materials, risks and sustainable solutions

Microplastics: Finding a consensus on the definition

Microplastics in Seawater: Recommendations from the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Implementation Process