Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this exploratory paper is to analyze how complexity of an artifact affects designing processes of its mechanical, electric, and software sub‐systems. Design/methodology/approach Based on existing empirical research and frameworks of axiomatic design, product architecture, and product development process, the paper proposes a simple model of functional and structural design to examine how engineers' ways of thinking differ among mechanical, electric and software engineers. Findings This paper argues that products and artifacts tend to become complex (often with integral architecture) when customers' functional requirements become more demanding and societal/technological constraints become stricter, and that complex mechanical products are often accompanied by electronic control units with complex functions. This implies that designing complex mechanical products often requires intensive coordination among mechanical, electric and software engineers. This, however, is not easy, as engineers' way of thinking is often different among the three areas: mechanical engineers want to complete structural design information first to build prototypes; electrical and software engineers (the latter in particular) request complete functional information first. Research limitations/implications In order to solve the above‐mentioned mechanical‐electrical‐software coordination problem, engineers need to share basic design concept of the product in question. Heavy‐weight product managers who infuse the product concept to the project members might be the key to this coordination. Companies may need to make sure that their product development processes are friendly to all of the three groups of engineers. Originality/value Although designing complex artifacts has been a popular research theme since H. Simon's seminal work, issues of organizational coordination for developing complex products, with increasing managerial importance, need further research. With an empirical case of the automobile and electronic products, the present paper is unique in that it combines frameworks of product development processes, product architectures, and organizational capabilities.

A Design Complexity Evaluation Framework for Agent-Based System Engineering Methodologies

Multi-component Agent Based Collaborative Design System

Domain Engineering Approach for Multi-Agent System

A Review & Framework for Modeling Complex Engineered System Development Processes

Mechanical Engineering Design Complexity Metrics: Size, Coupling, and Solvability

A Multi-Agent Based Evaluation Framework and Its Applications

Developing an intelligent systems design framework based on multidisciplinary design analysis and multi-agent thinking integration

Complex System Simulation: Proposition of a MBSE Framework for Design-Analysis Integration

Research on DFx evaluation system for distributed design based on multi-agent

Complexity and control: benchmarking of automobiles and electronic products

Engineering hierarchical complex systems: an agent-based approach. The case of flexible manufacturing systems

Determining a Framework for the Generation and Evaluation of Ambient Intelligent Agent System Designs

Assessment of the Design Complexity of Modular Automated Assembly System

Design Level Metrics to Measure the Complexity Across Versions of AO Software

System Design Automation: Challenges and Limitations

Addressing Challenges to Problem Complexity: Effectiveness of AI Assistance During the Design Process

A multi-agent system to dynamically devise an LCA framework weighting system taking into account socio-technical and environmental consideration

Multi-Fidelity Design Framework Integrating Compositional Kernels to Facilitate Early-Stage Design Exploration of Complex Systems

Framework for integrated mechanical design automation

Agent-based modelling for early-stage optimization of spatial structures

Advancing Agentic Systems: Dynamic Task Decomposition, Tool Integration and Evaluation using Novel Metrics and Dataset