Abstract:Airborne diseases have always been one of the main causes of human morbidity and mortality worldwide. There are hundreds of airborne communicable pathogens resulting in millions of deaths and injuries annually. With the continuous development of epidemiology and other related disciplines, combined with the promotion of modern engineering technology, the control methods of airborne transmission have been developed markedly, but the spread of these diseases has never been stopped, resulting in endless social and economic losses. According to the WHO statistics, about 5–10% of the world’s adults and 20–30% children suffered from influenza each year, causing 300–500 million severe cases and 20–50 million deaths. Although tuberculosis can be treated and cured at present, nearly eight million people were still infected each year, and two million of these died every year. Therefore, how to effectively reduce the casualties caused by airborne infection and control the spread of these airborne diseases is one of the most urgent problems that need to be addressed in the field of epidemiology and other associated disciplines. An important reason why airborne diseases are difficult to control is that they can easily spread in crowded places. For example, schools and nursery institutions have always been prone to high incidences of influenza; tuberculosis, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and norovirus. All these have been documented to spread in aircraft cabins. Similar crowded spaces also include crowded offices, public transports conference rooms, restaurants, theatres and so on. Due to the large density of occupants and relatively long exposure time, respiratory infectious diseases are prone to outbreak in these places. Many studies have indicated that the incidence of respiratory diseases is closely related to the density of people or the degree of crowding. Although the ventilation rates (especially for fresh air) have been raised according to various standards for such highly occupied spaces, these are really aimed at maintaining good indoor air quality and thermal comfort without a proper consideration to control airborne infection. Meanwhile, the increase of air change rate of ventilation can cause a higher burden of energy consumption. The outbreak of diseases such as SARS and influenza A virus in recent years has brought profound lessons to our ventilation design. The previous simple design of airflow distribution cannot meet the needs of protecting indoor human health and reducing threats of new diseases any more. The new balanced ventilation mode with a comprehensive consideration of energy conservation, thermal comfort, air quality and health should be developed. There are mainly two ventilation strategies applicable to control the risk of cross-infection in highly occupied spaces. One way is to increase the total ventilation rate to a sufficient level to minimize airborne infection, but how much ventilation air is sufficient is still a controversial subject of debate. The other way is to improve the ventilation efficiency for individual occupants. Personalized ventilation (PV) which delivers fresh air directly to the occupant’s breathing zone can serve as a possible solution. Figure 1 depicts the relationships between ventilation modes and airborne infection risk in highly occupied spaces. Human breathing, e.g. coughing, sneezing, speaking, breathing, etc. is one of the most important sources of airborne transmitted pathogens. Effective engineering

Quantifying the tradeoff between energy consumption and the risk of airborne disease transmission for building HVAC systems

Comparison of effectiveness and energy use of airborne pathogen mitigation measures to meet clean air targets in a prototypical office building

The Trade-Off between Airborne Pandemic Control and Energy Consumption Using Air Ventilation Solutions

Reconciling airborne disease transmission concerns with energy saving requirements: the potential of UV-C pathogen deactivation and air distribution optimization

Quantifying indoor infection risk based on a metric-driven approach and machine learning

Ventilation Strategies for Mitigation of Infection Disease Transmission in an Indoor Environment: A Case Study in Office

Energy recovery ventilators to combat indoor airborne disease transmission: A sustainable approach

Nationwide evaluation of energy and indoor air quality predictive control and impact on infection risk for cooling season

A quanta-independent approach for the assessment of strategies to reduce the risk of airborne infection

Numerical investigation of airborne transmission in low-ceiling rooms under displacement ventilation

A novel approach of integrating ventilation and air cleaning for sustainable and healthy office environments

Predicting the spatio-temporal infection risk in indoor spaces using an efficient airborne transmission model

Infection probability under different air distribution patterns

Estimating ventilation rates in rooms with varying occupancy levels: Relevance for reducing transmission risk of airborne pathogens

The cost-effectiveness of standalone HEPA filtration units for the prevention of airborne SARS CoV-2 transmission

Multizonal modeling of SARS-CoV-2 aerosol dispersion in a virtual office building

An intelligent anti-infection ventilation strategy: from occupant-centric control and computer vision perspectives

Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation Energy in University Classrooms: Simplified Model to Predict Trade-Offs and Synergies

Covid 19 and beyond: a procedure for HVAC systems to address infectious aerosol illness transmission

A Comprehensive Index for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ventilation-Related Infection Prevention Measures with Energy Considerations: Development and Application Perspectives

Personalized Ventilation: One Possible Solution for Airborne Infection Control in Highly Occupied Space?