The effect of application of a Soton ureteroscope on infection after flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy

Xiaobo Zhang,Zhenyu Liu,Xiong Chen,Dongjie Li,Zhiming Yang,Jie Gu,Sheng Hu,Yuxin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.107763
2022-01-01
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Postoperative infection is still one of the most common complications following flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (FURL). However, whether a combination of negative pressure ureteroscopy (and Soton ureteroscopy) is superior to FURL in lithotripsy with regard to intraoperative pressure and possibly the incidence of postoperative infection remains to be validated.AIM: To explore the effect of a Soton ureteroscope on infection following flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty patients with kidney stones were randomly divided equally into study and control groups. The operation duration, stone-free rate, postoperative blood routine, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and other data between the two groups were then analysed and compared.RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the study group and the control group regarding the average operation time and the average number of hospitalization days. The mean stone-free rate 1 week after surgery and mean VAS pain score 1 day after surgery for the study group and the control group were 91.3% and 0.27 vs. 76.9% and 0.61, respectively. Notably, the average body temperature after the first day of the operation was 36.4°C in the study group and 36.7°C in the control group. More importantly, concerning postoperative infection index, white blood cells (WBCs), percentage of neutrophils, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin were all lower in the study group than in the control group.CONCLUSIONS: Compared with flexible ureteroscopy alone, combined use of Soton ureteroscopy is associated with fewer substantially infection following lithotripsy.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?