Abstract P-24: Microscopic Analyses of Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation Induced by Linker Histone H1.0

Olga Geraskina,Natalya Maluchenko,Vasily Studitsky,Nadezhda Gerasimova,Daria Koshkina,Alexey Feofanov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21103/ijbm.11.suppl_1.p24
2021-06-01
International Journal of Biomedicine
Abstract:Background: Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) that leads to the formation of temporary functional domains in cells plays an important role in the processes of chromatin condensation and gene regulation. Earlier, it was demonstrated that histone H1.4 can form LLPS droplets with DNA. In the present work, LLPS was studied for histone H1.0, which is mainly expressed in differentiated and non-dividing cells. H1.0 is involved in cancer development: its amount decreases with the progression of tumor cells to malignancy. Methods: LSM710 confocal microscope (Zeiss) equipped with the 40x/1.2W objective was used to image mixtures of H1.0 with Cy3/Cy5 labeled DNA or nucleosomes in fluorescent and transmitted-light channels at the excitation of 514 nm. The formation of condensates as a result of LLPS was confirmed by salt-jump and FRAP/FLIP experiments. Results: Condensates were not observed when the ratio of negative to positive charges (N/P) in the samples was >1. At N/P~0.7, optically homogeneous droplet-like condensates were found. The appearance of condensates, their size and shape depended on concentrations of H1.0 and DNA. LLPS condensates but not aggregates disappeared by salt-jump to 650 mM NaCl. FRAP/FLIP experiments revealed a moderate rate of fluorescence recovery (τ1⁄222s) indicating moderate DNA mobility of the H1.0-mediated condensates. The appearance of condensates was also observed in the mixtures of H1.0, DNA and Cy3/Cy5-labeled nucleosomes. Nucleosomes were involved in the condensate formation and found to be 2-fold more mobile (τ1⁄210 s) than DNA. Conclusion: LLPS-related properties of H1.0 were studied for DNA and nucleosomes in vitro. Comparison with H1.4 shows that H1.0 forms liquid condensates of approximately the same size. Our result also may indicate that chromatin retains pronounced dynamic properties in H1.0-induced droplets despite the fact that H1.0 induces the formation of more compact chromatin.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?