Abstract:In the past, the contrasts between rural and urban regions were the primary feature of analysis, while today, spatial dynamics are realized by the interactions between spaces and focus on the dependencies of rural-urban areas. This implies that boundaries are not anymore perceived as fixed but as flexible and fluid. With rising spatial interrelations, the concept of the “city-region” has been increasingly regarded as a meaningful concept for the implementation of development policies. Governance arrangements working at the rural-urban interface are often highly complex. They are characterized by horizontal and vertical coordination of numerous institutional public and private actors. In general, they provide opportunities to reap benefits and try to ameliorate negative outcomes but, due to asymmetric power relations, rural areas are often challenged to make their voice heard within city-region governance structures which can too easily become focused on the needs of the urban areas. This paper addresses these issues of rural-urban partnerships through the case of the Metropolitan Area of Styria. It presents analyses on the core issue of how to recognize the structure and driving challenges for regional co-operation and inter-communal collaboration in this city-region. Data were collected through workshops with regional stakeholders and interviews with mayors. Although the Metropolitan Area of Styria occupies an increased reference in policy discourses, the city-region has not grown to a uniform region and there are still major differences in terms of economic performance, the distribution of decision-making power, accessibility and development opportunities. If there should be established a stronger material and imagined cohesion in the city-region, it requires enhanced assistance for municipalities with less financial and personal resources, and tangible good practices of inter-municipal co-operation. The ability to act at a city-regional level depends highly on the commitment for co-operation in the formal and informal governance arrangement, and on the willingness for political compromises as well as on the formulation of common future goals.

Urban Leadership and Community Involvement: Ingredients for Good Governance?

Politics-Administration/Officials-Citizens: Exploring Linkages in Community Governance

Conflits urbains, participation et démocratie: Exemples allemands pour une gouvernance urbaine innovante

Integrated Collaborative Governance Approaches towards Urban Transformation: Experiences from the CLEVER Cities Project

Leadership and the governance of rural communities

Defining the limits of community governance

Towards political cohesion in metropolitan areas. An overview of governance models

Urban design leadership: Part 2, the case of public architects

Urban design leadership: part 1, the styles of leadership

Formal and Informal Governance Arrangements to Boost Sustainable and Inclusive Rural-Urban Synergies: An Analysis of the Metropolitan Area of Styria

Governing from the middle: the C40 Cities Leadership Group

Leading the healthy city: taking advantage of the power of place

The Cultural Dimension of Metagovernance: Why Governance Doctrines May Fail

The Challenged Interplay of Integrative Aims and Shared Leadership: Experiences From Nordic Practice

Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy?

Community governance and democracy

Institutional Capacity-building in Urban Planning and Policy-making for Sustainable Development: Success or Failure?

Towards Interactive Governance: Embedding Citizen Participation in Local Government

How Does Community Leadership Contribute to Rural Environmental Governance? Evidence from Shanghai Villages

How Civil Servants Frame Participation: Balancing Municipal Responsibility With Citizen Initiative in Ede’s Food Policy

Understanding the science-policy interface in urban climate governance from a co-production perspective: Insights from the cases of Hamburg and São Paulo