Correction: The Myth of Man the Hunter: Women's contribution to the hunt across ethnographic contexts
Abigail Anderson,Sophia Chilczuk,Kaylie Nelson,Roxanne Ruther,Cara Wall-Scheffler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309543
IF: 3.7
2024-08-24
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. Learn More Submit Now Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here. Loading metrics Open Access Correction After publication of this article [1], concerns were raised about the reliability and replicability of the results. The authors report that while some of the concerns raised reflect ongoing, open questions in the field, some aspects of the methodology could benefit from more detail. This notice seeks to provide additional nuance and methodological information to further conversations about this topic. The data on hunting and how these data were identified and extracted from D-PLACE did not initially include page numbers. The updated data table with page numbers included has now been provided as Supporting Information with this notice. The word 'forager' is often used by anthropologists to imply a member of a small-scale subsistence group who gains access to diverse or varying foods around a daily or seasonal basis. It can imply a highly mobile lifestyle, but also does not have to, as some foragers are referred to as 'semi-sedentary foragers' [2]. A broad use of the word forager is not atypical; small-scale "horticulturalists" or "agriculturalists" who also hunt and gather (as do the groups in this study) are regularly included under the umbrella of "forager." The term foraging is considered to imply small-scale subsistence, and to include hunting (even when the group also uses horticulture) [3]. Whereas people might have personal preferences about the term that is used, the majority of anthropologists see the word forager as inclusive of small-scale societies that practice a wide range of seasonally varying activities that can include hunting, gathering, horticulture, and agriculture [4–6]. These are not rigid boxes for small human populations and we continue to be comfortable with the broad reaching meaning of forager which includes small-scale groups who participate in seasonal foraging and hunting, as well as seasonal production of some crops. Regardless, concerns that the diversity of groups included in Anderson et al.'s study might have skewed the results are unwarranted as the five groups identified as being of a broader definition of foraging have the exact same percentage as the group as a whole, namely 80% show evidence of women killing terrestrial vertebrates. The groups were chosen because books or papers about them relating to subsistence economy were identified in D-PLACE. D-PLACE was initially developed as a place to identify linguistic groups, and as such only a small fraction of all the groups had initial indications that subsistence information was known for the groups. Once we had the smaller dataset of groups with known subsistence strategies, we began the work of determining which groups had further information about specific food acquisition methods. This involved looking for books or papers that referenced these groups. We used the references listed in D-PLACE, Binford's ethnographic atlas [7] and electronic search engines (university libraries, Web of Science, JSTOR, Google) to find references to papers, books or monographs that mentioned the named subsistence groups. If the group did not actually have a reference listed in D-PLACE, or if we could not find any mention to a group's subsistence in an electronic database (including JSTOR which searches digital archives and not just key words) then that group was not included further in the study. Included groups, at this stage, were those where literature was found containing data on how the group used the land and food/water resources; these groups represented all habitable continents. Sometimes the groups would be referenced in works cited but the citations were to volumes not available electronically, so those books/papers/monographs were obtained from libraries. All material, whether available electronically or in hard copy, was read cover-to-cover. We did not use electronic word searches. If data on how the group got food was not available, they were excluded. The next step was identifying the gender of the hunters, which determined the final sample size reported in the article. If the gender of the hunters was not available, the group was excluded. Primary sources or work by the initial ethnographer (as determined by the earliest citations) of a particular geographic area whose work was the main source of information on a particular group, as cited by others, were prioritized. In most cases all papers and articles about subsistence written by the initial or most cited ethnographer were read until identification of the gender of the person or people do -Abstract Truncated-
multidisciplinary sciences